← All FR Documents ·← Back to 2024-10023
Final Rule

Safety Zones; Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley Annual and Recurring Safety Zones Update

In Plain English

What is this Federal Register notice?

This is a final rule published in the Federal Register by Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard. Final rules have completed the public comment process and establish legally binding requirements.

Is this rule final?

Yes. This rule has been finalized. It has completed the notice-and-comment process required under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Who does this apply to?

Consult the full text of this document for specific applicability provisions. The affected parties depend on the regulatory scope defined within.

When does it take effect?

This document has been effective since March 15, 2024.

Why it matters: This final rule amends regulations in 33 CFR Part 165.

📋 Related Rulemaking

This final rule likely has a preceding Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), but we haven't linked it yet.

Our system will automatically fetch and link related NPRMs as they're discovered.

Regulatory History — 22 documents in this rulemaking

  1. Jan 23, 2024 2024-01186 Proposed Rule
    Safety Zones; Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley Annual and Recurring Safety Zone...
  2. Mar 7, 2024 2024-04841 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; St. Louis River/Duluth-Superior Harbor, Duluth, MN
  3. Mar 8, 2024 2024-05008 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Tampa Bay, Tampa, FL
  4. Mar 15, 2024 2024-05586 Final Rule
    Safety Zones; Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley Annual and Recurring Safety Zone...
  5. Mar 25, 2024 2024-06224 Proposed Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; NW Natural Gasco Sediment Site Field Pilot Study, ...
  6. Apr 11, 2024 2024-07704 Proposed Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Port of Miami, Miami, FL
  7. Apr 30, 2024 2024-09266 Final Rule
    Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, Natchez, MS
  8. May 8, 2024 2024-10023 Proposed Rule
    Safety Zones, Lake Erie and Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
  9. May 21, 2024 2024-10742 Proposed Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
  10. May 22, 2024 2024-11044 Proposed Rule
    Safety Zone; Sea Otter Point, Port of Valdez, AK
  11. May 22, 2024 2024-11252 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Coast Guard Sector Key West, Trumbo Point Annex, Key West Harb...
  12. May 24, 2024 2024-11454 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; NW Natural Gasco Sediment Site Field Pilot Study, ...
  13. Jul 8, 2024 2024-14703 Final Rule
    Safety Zones, Lake Erie and Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
  14. Jul 31, 2024 2024-16821 Final Rule
    Safety Zone; Sea Otter Point, Port of Valdez, AK
  15. Aug 28, 2024 2024-19379 Proposed Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Port of Miami, Miami, FL
  16. Nov 25, 2024 2024-27557 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
  17. Feb 25, 2025 2025-03021 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
  18. Apr 22, 2025 2025-06868 Proposed Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Ludington Harbor Channel and Pere Marquette Lake, ...
  19. Jun 11, 2025 2025-10608 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
  20. Jun 16, 2025 2025-10937 Proposed Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Illinois River, Naplate, IL
  21. Aug 6, 2025 2025-14884 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Ludington Harbor Channel and Pere Marquette Lake, ...
  22. Sep 16, 2025 2025-17839 Final Rule
    Regulated Navigation Area; Illinois River, Naplate, IL

Document Details

Document Number2024-05586
TypeFinal Rule
PublishedMar 15, 2024
Effective DateMar 15, 2024
RIN1625-AA11
Docket IDDocket Number USCG-2023-0904
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

Related Documents (by RIN/Docket)

Doc #TypeTitlePublished
2025-17839 Final Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Illinois Rive... Sep 16, 2025
2025-14884 Final Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Ludington Har... Aug 6, 2025
2025-10937 Proposed Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Illinois Rive... Jun 16, 2025
2025-10608 Final Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Cuyahoga Rive... Jun 11, 2025
2025-06868 Proposed Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Ludington Har... Apr 22, 2025
2025-03021 Final Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Cuyahoga Rive... Feb 25, 2025
2024-27557 Final Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Cuyahoga Rive... Nov 25, 2024
2024-19379 Proposed Rule Regulated Navigation Area; Port of Miami... Aug 28, 2024
2024-16821 Final Rule Safety Zone; Sea Otter Point, Port of Va... Jul 31, 2024
2024-14703 Final Rule Safety Zones, Lake Erie and Cuyahoga Riv... Jul 8, 2024

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutable—once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

Full Document Text (4,445 words · ~23 min read)

Text Preserved
<RULE> DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY <SUBAGY>Coast Guard</SUBAGY> <CFR>33 CFR Part 165</CFR> <DEPDOC>[Docket Number USCG-2023-0904]</DEPDOC> <RIN>RIN 1625-AA11</RIN> <SUBJECT>Safety Zones; Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley Annual and Recurring Safety Zones Update</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Final rule. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> The Coast Guard is amending and updating its safety zone regulations for annual events that take place in the Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley area of responsibility (AOR). This action is necessary to update the current list of recurring safety zones with revisions, additional events, and removal of events that no longer take place in the Sector Ohio Valley. When these safety zones are enforced, certain restrictions are placed on marine traffic in specified areas. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> This rule is effective on March 15, 2024. </EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD> To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to <E T="03">https://www.regulations.gov,</E> type USCG-2023-0904 in the search box and click “Search.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.” <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Dalton Johnson, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 502-779-5347, email <E T="03">Dalton.A.Johnson@uscg.mil.</E> </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Table of Abbreviations</HD> <EXTRACT> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">AOR Area of Responsibility</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">COTP Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">CFR Code of Federal Regulations</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">DHS Department of Homeland Security</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">E.O. Executive Order</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">FR Federal Register</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">§ Section </FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">U.S.C. United States Code</FP> </EXTRACT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Background Information and Regulatory History</HD> The Captain of Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) is amending 33 CFR 165.801 to update the table of annual fireworks displays and other events in Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley Area of Responsibility (AOR). These events include air shows, fireworks displays, and other events requiring a safety zone. On January 23, 2024, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled “Safety Zones; Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley Annual and Recurring Safety Zones Update” (89 FR 4221). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to those recurring safety zones. During the comment period that ended on February 22, 2024, no comments were received. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> . Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of the events occurring in April. <HD SOURCE="HD1">III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule</HD> The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Coast Guard is amending and updating the safety zones under 33 CFR part 165 to include the most up to date list of recurring safety zones for events held on or around navigable waters within the Sector Ohio Valley AOR. These events include fireworks displays, air shows, and festivals. The current list in 33 CFR 165.801 requires changes to provide new information on existing safety zones and to include new safety zones expected to recur annually or biannually. Issuing individual regulations for each new safety zone, amendment of existing safety zones creates unnecessary administrative costs and burdens. This rulemaking reduces administrative overhead and provides the public with notice through publication in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> of the upcoming recurring safety zones. Based on the nature of these events, large numbers of participants and spectators, and event locations, the COTP has determined that the events listed in this rule could pose a risk to participants or waterways users if the normal vessel traffic were to interfere with the events. Possible hazards include risks of injury or death from near or actual contact among participant vessels and spectators or mariners traversing through the regulated area. This purpose of this rule is to ensure the safety of all waterway users, including event participants and spectators, during the scheduled events. <HD SOURCE="HD1">IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule</HD> As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published January 23, 2024. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM. This rule amends and updates part 165 of 33 CFR by revising the current table for Sector Ohio Valley, and by adding three new recurring safety zones and amending two safety zones as described in the NPRM. Vessels intending to transit the designated waterway through the safety zone will only be allowed to transit the area when the COTP, or designated representative, has deemed it safe to do so or at the completion of the event. <HD SOURCE="HD1">V. Regulatory Analyses</HD> We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. <HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Regulatory Planning and Review</HD> Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the safety zones. These safety zones are limited in size and duration, and are usually positioned away from high vessel traffic areas. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notices to Mariners, Local Notices to Mariners, and Marine Safety Information Broadcasts to inform the community of these safety zones. <HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Impact on Small Entities</HD> The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the <E T="02">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT</E> section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. <HD SOURCE="HD2">C. Collection of Information</HD> This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). <HD SOURCE="HD2">D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments</HD> A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. <HD SOU ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 36k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.