← Back to FR Documents
Final Rule

Safety Zone; Anclote River, Tarpon Springs, FL

Temporary final rule.

πŸ“– Research Context From Federal Register API

Summary:

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters of the Anclote River in Tarpon Springs, FL for the removal of a dredging pipe. The safety zone will encompass all waters within a 200-yard radius of the dredge vessel DIAMOND 6 and the tug vessel LADY LAFON. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by dredge work and removal of a dredging pipe. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port St Petersburg.

Key Dates
Citation: 89 FR 21211
This temporary rule is effective without actual notice from March 27, 2024 through March 30, 2024. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from March 24, 2024, until March 27, 2024.
Public Participation
0 comments 1 supporting doc
View on Regulations.gov β†’
Topics:
Harbors Marine safety Navigation (water) Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Security measures Waterways

Document Details

Document Number2024-06436
FR Citation89 FR 21211
TypeFinal Rule
PublishedMar 27, 2024
Effective DateMar 27, 2024
RIN1625-AA00
Docket IDDocket Number USCG-2024-0229
Pages21211–21213 (3 pages)
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

Agency Hierarchy:
CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

Related Documents (by RIN/Docket)

Doc #TypeTitlePublished
2026-02203 Final Rule Safety Zone; Ice Accumulations; Alleghen... Feb 3, 2026
2026-01882 Proposed Rule Safety Zone; Inner Harbor, Baltimore, MD... Jan 30, 2026
2026-01316 Final Rule Safety Zone; St. Clair River, St. Clair,... Jan 23, 2026
2026-01168 Final Rule Safety Zone; Rocket Test Site, Rio Grand... Jan 22, 2026
2026-01064 Final Rule Safety Zone; Philippine Sea, Pacific Oce... Jan 21, 2026
2026-01070 Final Rule Fixed and Moving Safety Zone; Vicinity o... Jan 21, 2026
2026-00453 Final Rule Safety Zone; Plane Crash Response Betwee... Jan 13, 2026
2026-00326 Final Rule Safety Zone; Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, FL... Jan 12, 2026
2026-00176 Final Rule Fixed and Moving Safety Zone; Vicinity o... Jan 8, 2026
2026-00048 Proposed Rule Safety Zone; West of Cyril E. King Airpo... Jan 7, 2026

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutableβ€”once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

β–Ό Full Document Text (2,061 words Β· ~11 min read)

Text Preserved
<RULE> DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY <SUBAGY>Coast Guard</SUBAGY> <CFR>33 CFR Part 165</CFR> <DEPDOC>[Docket Number USCG-2024-0229]</DEPDOC> <RIN>RIN 1625-AA00</RIN> <SUBJECT>Safety Zone; Anclote River, Tarpon Springs, FL</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Temporary final rule. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters of the Anclote River in Tarpon Springs, FL for the removal of a dredging pipe. The safety zone will encompass all waters within a 200-yard radius of the dredge vessel DIAMOND 6 and the tug vessel LADY LAFON. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by dredge work and removal of a dredging pipe. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port St Petersburg. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> This temporary rule is effective without actual notice from March 27, 2024 through March 30, 2024. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from March 24, 2024, until March 27, 2024. </EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD> To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to <E T="03">https://www.regulations.gov,</E> type USCG-2024-0229 in the search box and click β€œSearch.” Next, in the Document Type column, select β€œSupporting & Related Material.” <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> If you have questions about this rule, call or email Marine Science Technician First Class Mara J. Brown, Sector St. Petersburg Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone 813-228-2191, email <E T="03">Mara.J.Brown@uscg.mil.</E> </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Table of Abbreviations</HD> <EXTRACT> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">CFR Code of Federal Regulations</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">DHS Department of Homeland Security</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">FR Federal Register</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">§ Section </FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">U.S.C. United States Code</FP> </EXTRACT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Background Information and Regulatory History</HD> The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This statutory provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are β€œimpracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” The Coast Guard did not receive final details of this event until March 11, 2024. It is impracticable to go through the full notice and comment rulemaking process because the Coast Guard must establish this safety zone by March 24, 2024 and lacks sufficient time to provide for a comment period and then consider those comments before issuing the rule. Additionally, immediate action is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the Anclote River within the safety zone while the removal of a dredging pipe is underway. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> . Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from the potential safety hazards associated with the removal of a dredging pipe located in the Anclote River in Tarpon Springs, FL. <HD SOURCE="HD1">III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule</HD> The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The Captain of the Port Sector St Petersburg (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with removal of a dredging pipe beginning on March 24, 2024, will be a safety concern for anyone within a 200-yard radius of the dredge vessel DIAMOND 6 and tug vessel LADY LAFON. This rule is needed to ensure the safety of vessels and persons in the navigable waters within the safety zone during the removal of the dredging pipe. <HD SOURCE="HD1">IV. Discussion of the Rule</HD> This rule establishes a safety zone from 10 a.m. on March 24, 2024, through 7 p.m. on March 30, 2024. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters within 200 yards of the Dredge DIAMOND 6 and Tug LADY LAFON, located on the Anclote River, approximate position at Latitude: 28Β°9β€²21.51β€³ N, Longitude: 82Β°45β€²58.68β€³ W. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and persons during the removal of the dredging pipe. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. <HD SOURCE="HD1">V. Regulatory Analyses</HD> We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. <HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Regulatory Planning and Review</HD> Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a β€œsignificant regulatory action,” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the limited duration, narrowly tailored geographic area, and scope of the safety zone. Although the rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant because the local waterways users will be notified to ensure the safety zone will result in minimal impact during the 9 hours per day of the dredging pipe removal. It is limited in scope as vessel traffic may seek permission from the COTP to enter the zone. Additionally, vessel traffic will be able to safely transit around the safety zone. <HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Impact on Small Entities</HD> The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term β€œsmall entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the <E T="02">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT</E> section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. <HD SOURCE="HD2">C. Collection of Information</HD> This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). <HD SOURCE="HD2">D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments</HD> A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. <HD SOURCE="HD2">E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act</HD> The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflatio ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 14k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.