← Back to FR Documents
Final Rule

Special Conditions: Airbus Model A321neo XLR Airplane; Electronic Flight-Control System: Lateral-Directional and Longitudinal Stability, and Low-Energy Awareness

Final special conditions.

πŸ“– Research Context From Federal Register API

Summary:

These special conditions are issued for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the applicable airworthiness standards. This design feature is an electronic flight-control system (EFCS) associated with lateral- directional and longitudinal stability, and low-energy awareness. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

Key Dates
Citation: 89 FR 23507
Effective April 4, 2024.
Public Participation
Topics:
Aircraft Aviation safety Reporting and recordkeeping requirements

Document Details

Document Number2024-07139
FR Citation89 FR 23507
TypeFinal Rule
PublishedApr 4, 2024
Effective DateApr 4, 2024
RIN-
Docket IDDocket No. FAA-2021-1034
Pages23507–23510 (4 pages)
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutableβ€”once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

β–Ό Full Document Text (2,695 words Β· ~14 min read)

Text Preserved
<RULE> DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <SUBAGY>Federal Aviation Administration</SUBAGY> <CFR>14 CFR Part 25</CFR> <DEPDOC>[Docket No. FAA-2021-1034; Special Conditions No. 25-857-SC]</DEPDOC> <SUBJECT>Special Conditions: Airbus Model A321neo XLR Airplane; Electronic Flight-Control System: Lateral-Directional and Longitudinal Stability, and Low-Energy Awareness</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Final special conditions. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> These special conditions are issued for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the applicable airworthiness standards. This design feature is an electronic flight-control system (EFCS) associated with lateral-directional and longitudinal stability, and low-energy awareness. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> Effective April 4, 2024. </EFFDATE> <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> Troy Brown, Performance and Environment Unit, AIR-621A, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 1801 S Airport Rd., Wichita, KS 67209-2190; telephone and fax 405-666-1050; email <E T="03">troy.a.brown@faa.gov.</E> </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">Background</HD> On September 16, 2019, Airbus applied for an amendment to Type Certificate No. A28NM to include the new Model A321neo XLR airplane. This airplane is a twin-engine, transport-category airplane, with seating for 244 passengers, and a maximum takeoff weight of 222,000 pounds. <HD SOURCE="HD1">Type Certification Basis</HD> Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Airbus must show that the Model A321neo XLR airplane meets the applicable provisions of the regulations listed in Type Certificate No. A28NM, or the applicable regulations in effect on the date of application for the change, except for earlier amendments as agreed upon by the FAA. If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations ( <E T="03">e.g.,</E> 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplane because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of § 21.16. Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to the other model under § 21.101. In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special conditions, the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplane must comply with the fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in § 11.19, in accordance with § 11.38, and they become part of the type certification basis under § 21.101. <HD SOURCE="HD1">Novel or Unusual Design Feature</HD> The Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplane will incorporate the following novel or unusual design feature: An EFCS associated with lateral-directional and longitudinal stability, and low-energy awareness. <HD SOURCE="HD1">Proposed Special Conditions</HD> The FAA issued Notice of Proposed Special Conditions No. FAA-2021-1034, which was published in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> on November 3, 2023 (88 FR 75517). In that document, the FAA explained that the Airbus' proposed A321neo XLR includes an EFCS, and that the control laws of that system can result in neutral static lateral-directional stability and neutral static longitudinal stability, insufficient feedback to the flightcrew from the pitching moment, and insufficient awareness that the airplane is in a low-energy state. The FAA therefore proposed that the applicable airworthiness regulations are inadequate or inappropriate to address these issues and proposed special conditions to address them. The FAA proposed that in the absence of positive lateral stability, the curve of lateral control-surface deflections against sideslip angle should be, in a conventional sense and reasonably in harmony with, rudder deflection during steady-heading sideslip maneuvers. The FAA further proposed that because conventional relationships between stick forces and control-surface displacements do not apply to the β€œload-factor command” flight-control system on the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplane, longitudinal stability characteristics should be evaluated by assessing the airplane's handling qualities during simulator and flight-test maneuvers appropriate to operation of the airplane. Additionally, under icing and non-icing conditions there may be a difference in full pedal deflection. This difference may result in changes to testing before reaching full pedal deflection, and these special conditions account for these differences. The airplane must provide adequate awareness cues to the pilot of a low-energy (low-speed/low-thrust/low-height) state to ensure that the airplane retains sufficient energy to recover when flight-control laws provide neutral longitudinal stability significantly below the normal operating speeds. β€œAdequate awareness” means that information must be provided to alert the crew of unsafe operating conditions and to enable them to take appropriate corrective action. Testing of these awareness cues should occur by simulator and flight test in the operational flight envelope for which certification is requested. Testing should include a sufficient number of tests to allow the level of energy awareness, and the effects of energy-management errors, to be assessed. <HD SOURCE="HD1">Discussion of Comments and Final Special Conditions</HD> Airbus Commercial Aircraft (Airbus) and The Boeing Company (Boeing) submitted comments on the same provision of the proposed special conditions. The Static Lateral-Directional Stability section of the proposed special conditions required the applicant to conduct, in icing conditions, steady heading sideslip maneuvers in several configurations. The proposed conditions would have required these sideslip maneuvers to be conducted β€œover the range of sideslip angles appropriate to the operation of the airplane, but not less than those obtained with one half of available rudder control input.” Airbus and Boeing each recommended that these maneuvers be conducted with full pedal deflection but recommended different approaches to implement that change. Airbus requested that the FAA add a note stating that these maneuvers will be continued beyond the sideslip angles appropriate for normal operation of the airplane and demonstrate that full pedal travel can be safely applied. Airbus stated that deflecting the pedals as much as practicable in icing conditions would provide a better coverage of the intent of § 25.21(g) regarding § 25.177. Further, Airbus stated that the addition of this note would align FAA and EASA standards. Boeing recommended that the FAA revise the special conditions to require Airbus to conduct these sideslips β€œup to the angle at which full rudder control is used or a rudder control force of 180 pounds is obtained.” Boeing said this change would be consistent with the language of paragraph 4.15.2.3 of AC 25-25A, Performance and Handling Characteristics in Icing Conditions. AC 25-25A provides an acceptable means of showing compliance with certain requirements of part 25 of 14 CFR related to airplane performance and handling characteristics in icing conditions. To address static lateral directional stability, the AC provides, as examples of an acceptable test program, that the applicant may conduct steady heading sideslips, in certain configurations, including β€œto full rudder authority, 180 pounds of rudder pedal force, or full lateral control authority.” Paragraph 4.15.2.3. The FAA agrees with the commenters that full-pedal deflection meets the intent of § 25.21(g) and aligns with guidance in the referenced AC. The FAA also agrees that this approach is harmonized with EASA's certification approach  <SU>2</SU> <FTREF/> to this issue. The FAA finds that it is unnecessary to revise the condition as suggested by Boeing, and that the language provided by Airbus, with minor revision by the FAA, <SU>3</SU> <FTREF/> is sufficient to address this issue. <FTNT> <SU>2</SU>  EASA Certification Review Item (CRI) B-06, β€œFlight in Icing Conditions”, issue 2, April 11, 2013. </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>3</SU>  Under the U.S. regulatory system, notes are explanatory rather than mandatory. See, <E T="03">e.g.,</E> section 7.5 of the Document Drafting Handbook (Aug. 2018 Edition, Rev. 2.1, dated Oct. 2023). Therefore, in the final special conditions, the recommended language is no longer a β€œnote,” and the commenter's β€œwill” is a β€œmust.” </FTNT> These final special conditions correct minor discrepancies in the numbering of the proposed special conditions. Also, the proposed special conditions related to low energy awareness contained three instances of β€œshould.” The FAA has revised these to β€œmust” in these final special conditions, for enforceability and for consistency with the expectations of the ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 19k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.