← Back to FR Documents
Proposed Rule

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

Proposed rule.

📖 Research Context From Federal Register API

Summary:

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its regulations governing the confidentiality and release of VA records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974. VA proposes to exempt portions of the new "Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)--VA" (216VA10) system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 to prevent compromising the objectivity and fairness of the testing and evaluation process.

Key Dates
Citation: 89 FR 60337
Comments must be received on or before September 23, 2024.
Comments closed: September 23, 2024
Public Participation
1 comment 1 supporting doc
View on Regulations.gov →
Topics:
Administrative practice and procedure Archives and records Government employees Privacy Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Security measures

In Plain English

What is this Federal Register notice?

This is a proposed rule published in the Federal Register by Veterans Affairs Department. Proposed rules invite public comment before becoming final, legally binding regulations.

Is this rule final?

No. This is a proposed rule. It has not yet been finalized and is subject to revision based on public comments.

Who does this apply to?

Proposed rule.

When does it take effect?

Comments must be received on or before September 23, 2024.

📋 Rulemaking Status

This is a proposed rule. A final rule may be issued after the comment period and agency review.

Document Details

Document Number2024-16275
FR Citation89 FR 60337
TypeProposed Rule
PublishedJul 25, 2024
Effective Date-
RIN2900-AS11
Docket ID-
Pages60337–60339 (3 pages)
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

Agency Hierarchy:
CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

Related Documents (by RIN/Docket)

Doc #TypeTitlePublished
2025-18663 Final Rule Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation... Sep 25, 2025

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutable—once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

Full Document Text (1,825 words · ~10 min read)

Text Preserved
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS <CFR>38 CFR Part 1</CFR> <RIN>RIN 2900-AS11</RIN> <SUBJECT>Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Department of Veterans Affairs. <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Proposed rule. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its regulations governing the confidentiality and release of VA records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974. VA proposes to exempt portions of the new “Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)—VA” (216VA10) system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 to prevent compromising the objectivity and fairness of the testing and evaluation process. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> Comments must be received on or before September 23, 2024. </EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD> Comments may be submitted through <E T="03">www.regulations.gov.</E> Except as provided below, comments received before the close of the comment period will be available at <E T="03">www.regulations.gov</E> for public viewing, inspection, or copying, including any personally identifiable or confidential business information that is included in a comment. Comments received before the close of the comment period on <E T="03">www.regulations.gov</E> will be posted as soon as possible after they have been received. VA will not post <E T="03">Regulations.gov</E> public comments that make threats to individuals or institutions or suggest that the individual will take actions to harm the individual. VA encourages individuals not to submit duplicative comments; however, we will post comments from multiple unique commenters even if the content is identical or nearly identical to other comments. Any public comment received after the comment period's closing date is considered late and will not be considered in the final rulemaking. In accordance with the Providing Accountability Through Transparency Act of 2023, a 100 word Plain-Language Summary of this proposed rule is available at <E T="03">Regulations.gov</E> , under RIN 2900-AS11. <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> Stephania Griffin, Chief Privacy Officer, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, <E T="03">stephania.griffin@va.gov,</E> 704-245-2492 (this is not a toll-free number). </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> The Privacy Act of 1974, codified at section 552a of title 5, United States Code (U.S.C.), governs the means by which the U.S. Government collects, maintains, uses, and disseminates personally identifiable information. The Privacy Act applies to such information that is maintained in a “system of records.” A system of records is a group of any records under the control of an agency from which information about an individual is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. See section 552a(a)(4) and (5). VA maintains numerous systems of records and, in accordance with section 552a(e)(4), provides notice in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> each time a system of records is established or revised. In order to safeguard personal information contained in VA's systems of records and carry out the requirements of the Privacy Act, VA has established regulations in 38 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1.575 through 1.582. These regulations govern VA's policy on maintenance, use, and disclosure of information contained in its systems of records, including the ability of individuals to access information about themselves under the Privacy Act. While individuals may request access to records containing information about themselves under the Privacy Act, sections 552a(j) and (k) allow the head of a Federal agency to promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from the general accounting, access, and administrative provisions of the Privacy Act contained in section 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f). In particular, section 552a(j) provides for general exemptions and section 552a(k) provides for specific exemptions. Concurrent with this proposed rulemaking, notice is being provided in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> that VA is establishing a new system of records entitled “Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)—VA (216VA10).” Information in this new system of records will be used to document the records of VA police officer candidates and VA police officers undergoing psychological evaluations for hire or annually after hire. The function of the VA Police Service is to provide for the maintenance of law and order and the protection of persons and property on Department property. Having qualified individuals is critical to this function. Psychological evaluations, testing, and notes will contain data to assess the applicant's or employee's psychological fitness to meet the functional requirements of a VA police officer position. Such information will be provided by VA Police Officers and VA Police Officer candidates; VA psychologists and psychiatrists conducting psychological evaluations; VA police chiefs and supervisors; and VA human resources and occupational health staff. Consistent with section 552a(k)(6), which allows an agency to exempt testing or examination materials used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process, VA proposes to exempt portions of the “LEO Evals” system of records from the accounting, access, and administrative provisions of the Privacy Act established in section 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f). VA proposes this exemption because portions of a record may relate to testing and examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service. Access to or amendment of this information by VA police officers and VA police officer candidates would compromise the objectivity and fairness of the testing or examination process. Amendment of such records could also impose a highly impracticable administrative burden by requiring testing and examinations to be continuously re-administered. Without this proposed exemption, the accounting, access, and administrative provisions of the Privacy Act contained in 38 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f) would allow VA police officers and VA police officer candidates to obtain their personal information contained in the “LEO Evals” system of records, to obtain an accounting of certain disclosures of such personal information, and to amend certain personal information contained therein. Therefore, VA proposes to add this exemption to its current list of Privacy Act exemptions in new paragraph (f) of 38 CFR 1.582. This would ensure the integrity of the testing and examination process to certify only those VA police officers that possess the emotional and mental stability to serve in this critical role. As proposed, 38 CFR 1.582(f) would thus state that VA provides limited access to Law Enforcement Officer Evaluations (LEO Evals)—VA (216VA10). Subparagraph (1) would state that records contained in this system of records are exempted pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(6) from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through (I), and (f). Subparagraph (2) would further explain that these exemptions apply to the extent that information in this system of records is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(6) because they relate to testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service, the disclosure of which could compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process. <HD SOURCE="HD1">Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094</HD> Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) directs agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 (Executive Order on Modernizing Regulatory Review) supplements and reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing contemporary regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), and Executive Order 13563 of January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review). The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094. The Regulatory Impact Analysis associated with this rulemaking can be found as a supporting document at <E T="03">www.regulations.gov.</E> <HD SOURCE="HD1">Regulatory Flexibility Act</HD> The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). This proposed rule would exempt certain personnel evaluations from disclosure under certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. The Privacy Act primarily affects individuals and not entities and the proposed rule would impose no duties or ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 13k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.