<RULE>
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
<SUBAGY>Food and Drug Administration</SUBAGY>
<CFR>21 CFR Part 880</CFR>
<DEPDOC>[Docket No. FDA-2024-N-3356]</DEPDOC>
<SUBJECT>Medical Devices; General Hospital and Personal Use Devices; Classification of the Intravenous Catheter Force-Activated Separation Device</SUBJECT>
<HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD>
Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
<HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD>
Final amendment; final order.
<SUM>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD>
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is classifying the intravenous catheter force-activated separation device into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the intravenous catheter force-activated separation device's classification. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices.
</SUM>
<EFFDATE>
<HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD>
This order is effective August 16, 2024. The classification was applicable on May 27, 2021.
</EFFDATE>
<FURINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD>
Florencia Wilson, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2458, Silver Spring,
MD 20993-0002, 240-402-9978,
<E T="03">Florencia.Wilson@fda.hhs.gov.</E>
</FURINF>
<SUPLINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Background</HD>
Upon request, FDA has classified the intravenous catheter force-activated separation device as class II (special controls), which we have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as “postamendments devices” because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through “De Novo” classification, a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De Novo classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo application process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) and then a request for classification, if the person determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The classification will be according to the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the initial classification of the device.
When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request or premarket approval application to market a substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, defining “substantial equivalence”). Instead, sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">II. De Novo Classification</HD>
On September 18, 2019, FDA received Site Saver, Inc. d/b/a Lineus Medical's request for De Novo classification of the SafeBreak Vascular. FDA reviewed the request to classify the device under the criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on May 27, 2021, FDA issued an order to the requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 880.5220.
<SU>1</SU>
<FTREF/>
We have named the generic type of device intravenous catheter force-activated separation device and it is identified as a device placed in-line with an intravenous (IV) catheter and an intravascular administration set, including any administration set accessories. It separates into two parts when a specified force is applied. The device is intended to reduce the risk of IV catheter failure(s) requiring IV catheter replacement.
<FTNT>
<SU>1</SU>
FDA notes that the “ACTION” caption for this final order is styled as “Final amendment; final order,” rather than “Final order.” Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made to indicate that the document “amends” the Code of Federal Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the
<E T="04">Federal Register</E>
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
</FTNT>
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated specifically with this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks in table 1.
<GPOTABLE COLS="2" OPTS="L2,nj,i1" CDEF="s100,r100">
<TTITLE>Table 1—Intravenous Catheter Force-Activated Separation Device Risks and Mitigation Measures</TTITLE>
<CHED H="1">Identified risks to health</CHED>
<CHED H="1">Mitigation measures</CHED>
<ROW>
<ENT I="01">
Delays of therapy due to failure of device to function as expected (
<E T="03">e.g.,</E>
if separation force too low)
</ENT>
<ENT>Performance data, Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.</ENT>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<ENT I="01">
Mechanical complications (
<E T="03">e.g.,</E>
IV dislodgement, IV infiltration, occlusion, and phlebitis events requiring IV replacement) due to failure of device to function as expected (
<E T="03">e.g.,</E>
if separation force too high)
</ENT>
<ENT>Performance data, Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.</ENT>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<ENT I="01">Infection</ENT>
<ENT>Sterilization validation, Shelf life testing, Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.</ENT>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<ENT I="01">Air embolism</ENT>
<ENT>Non-clinical performance testing, and Labeling.</ENT>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<ENT I="01">Adverse tissue reaction</ENT>
<ENT>Biocompatibility evaluation, Pyrogenicity testing, and Non-clinical performance testing.</ENT>
</ROW>
</GPOTABLE>
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">III. Analysis of Environmental Impact</HD>
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">IV.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Preview showing 10k of 14k characters.
Full document text is stored and available for version comparison.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.