← All FR Documents ·← Back to 2025-04096
Final Rule

Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX

In Plain English

What is this Federal Register notice?

This is a final rule published in the Federal Register by Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard. Final rules have completed the public comment process and establish legally binding requirements.

Is this rule final?

Yes. This rule has been finalized. It has completed the notice-and-comment process required under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Who does this apply to?

Consult the full text of this document for specific applicability provisions. The affected parties depend on the regulatory scope defined within.

When does it take effect?

This document has been effective since December 26, 2024.

Why it matters: This final rule amends regulations in 33 CFR Part 165.

📋 Related Rulemaking

This final rule likely has a preceding Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), but we haven't linked it yet.

Our system will automatically fetch and link related NPRMs as they're discovered.

Regulatory History — 37 documents in this rulemaking

  1. Feb 21, 2024 2024-03486 Proposed Rule
    Security Zone; Port Valdez and Valdez Narrows, Valdez, AK
  2. Mar 11, 2024 2024-05089 Proposed Rule
    Security Zone; Cooper River, Charleston County, SC
  3. Apr 5, 2024 2024-07235 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Cooper River, Charleston, SC
  4. Apr 18, 2024 2024-08303 Final Rule
    Security Zone; 2024 NFL Draft, Detroit River, Detroit, MI
  5. Apr 29, 2024 2024-09103 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Port Valdez and Valdez Narrows, Valdez, AK
  6. May 9, 2024 2024-10125 Proposed Rule
    Security Zone, Lake Erie, Mentor (Mentor Headlands), Ohio
  7. May 10, 2024 2024-10225 Final Rule
    Safety Zone: Piers Park, Boston Inner Harbor, East Boston, MA
  8. Jun 21, 2024 2024-13781 Final Rule
    Safety Zone, Lake Erie, Mentor (Mentor Headlands), Ohio
  9. Jul 17, 2024 2024-15561 Final Rule
    Security Zones; 2024 Republican National Convention; Lake Michigan, Milwaukee...
  10. Aug 5, 2024 2024-17145 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Santa Monica Bay, Pacific Palisades, CA
  11. Aug 23, 2024 2024-18872 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Chicago River (Main Branch), North Branch Chicago River, South...
  12. Sep 27, 2024 2024-22106 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Monongahela River Mile Markers 0-43.5, Allegheny River Mile Ma...
  13. Oct 10, 2024 2024-23469 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  14. Oct 30, 2024 2024-25199 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  15. Nov 5, 2024 2024-25711 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  16. Nov 7, 2024 2024-25891 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  17. Nov 20, 2024 2024-27067 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  18. Dec 5, 2024 2024-28477 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  19. Dec 26, 2024 2024-30547 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  20. Dec 27, 2024 2024-30598 Final Rule
    Security Zone, Port of Miami, Florida
  21. Jan 7, 2025 2025-00013 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Potomac River and Anacostia River, and Adjacent Waters; Washin...
  22. Mar 14, 2025 2025-04096 Proposed Rule
    Security Zones; Tampa Bay: Big Bend, Boca Grande, Crystal River, East Bay, Hi...
  23. Apr 3, 2025 2025-05712 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Cooper River, Charleston, SC
  24. Apr 25, 2025 2025-07067 Proposed Rule
    Security Zone; Electric Boat Shipyard, Narragansett Bay, Quonset Point, North...
  25. May 9, 2025 2025-08194 Proposed Rule
    Security Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Saint Louis, MO
  26. Jun 5, 2025 2025-10224 Final Rule
    Security Zones; Tampa Bay: Big Bend, Boca Grande, Crystal River, East Bay, Hi...
  27. Jul 10, 2025 2025-12819 Proposed Rule
    Security Zone; Intracoastal Waterway, Palm Beach, FL
  28. Jul 30, 2025 2025-14394 Proposed Rule
    Security Zone; Base San Juan, San Juan, PR
  29. Aug 4, 2025 2025-14689 Proposed Rule
    Security Zones; Tampa Bay: Big Bend, Boca Grande, Crystal River, East Bay, Hi...
  30. Aug 8, 2025 2025-15092 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Electric Boat Shipyard, Narragansett Bay, Quonset Point, North...
  31. Sep 5, 2025 2025-17092 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Intracoastal Waterway, Palm Beach, FL
  32. Oct 1, 2025 2025-19115 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Lower Mississippi River, Mile Marker 96.8 to 97.5 Above Head o...
  33. Nov 21, 2025 2025-20567 Final Rule
    Security Zones; Old Port Tampa, Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Manbirtee Key, Seapor...
  34. Dec 4, 2025 2025-21909 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Coast Guard Base San Juan, San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico
  35. Dec 23, 2025 2025-23773 Proposed Rule
    Security Zones; Vessels Carrying Dangerous Cargo, Corpus Christi and La Quint...
  36. Jan 16, 2026 2026-00834 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi and La Quinta Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX
  37. Jan 23, 2026 2026-01248 Final Rule
    Security Zone; Corpus Christi and La Quinta Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX

Document Details

Document Number2024-30547
TypeFinal Rule
PublishedDec 26, 2024
Effective DateDec 26, 2024
RIN1625-AA87
Docket IDDocket Number USCG-2024-1078
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

Related Documents (by RIN/Docket)

Doc #TypeTitlePublished
2026-01248 Final Rule Security Zone; Corpus Christi and La Qui... Jan 23, 2026
2026-00834 Final Rule Security Zone; Corpus Christi and La Qui... Jan 16, 2026
2025-23773 Proposed Rule Security Zones; Vessels Carrying Dangero... Dec 23, 2025
2025-21909 Final Rule Security Zone; Coast Guard Base San Juan... Dec 4, 2025
2025-20567 Final Rule Security Zones; Old Port Tampa, Sunshine... Nov 21, 2025
2025-19115 Final Rule Security Zone; Lower Mississippi River, ... Oct 1, 2025
2025-17092 Final Rule Security Zone; Intracoastal Waterway, Pa... Sep 5, 2025
2025-15092 Final Rule Security Zone; Electric Boat Shipyard, N... Aug 8, 2025
2025-14689 Proposed Rule Security Zones; Tampa Bay: Big Bend, Boc... Aug 4, 2025
2025-14394 Proposed Rule Security Zone; Base San Juan, San Juan, ... Jul 30, 2025

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutable—once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

Full Document Text (2,278 words · ~12 min read)

Text Preserved
<RULE> DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY <SUBAGY>Coast Guard</SUBAGY> <CFR>33 CFR Part 165</CFR> <DEPDOC>[Docket Number USCG-2024-1078]</DEPDOC> <RIN>RIN 1625-AA87</RIN> <SUBJECT>Security Zone; Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Corpus Christi, TX</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Coast Guard, DHS. <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Temporary final rule. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving security zone for navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of certain vessels carrying cargo requiring an elevated level of security in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. The temporary security zone is needed to protect the vessels, the cargo, and the surrounding waterway from terrorist acts, sabotage, or other subversive acts, accidents, or events of a similar nature. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Corpus Christi or a designated representative. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from December 20, 2024, until December 26, 2024. This rule is effective without actual notice from December 26, 2024 until December 27, 2024. </EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD> To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to <E T="03">https://www.regulations.gov,</E> type USCG-2024-1078 in the search box and click “Search.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.” <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> If you have questions about this rule, call or email Lieutenant Tim Cardenas, Sector Corpus Christi Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 361-939-5130, email <E T="03">Timothy.J.Cardenas@uscg.mil</E> . </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Table of Abbreviations</HD> <EXTRACT> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">CFR Code of Federal Regulations</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">COTP Captain of the Port, Sector Corpus Christi</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">DHS Department of Homeland Security</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">FR Federal Register</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">§ Section </FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">U.S.C. United States Code</FP> </EXTRACT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Background Information and Regulatory History</HD> The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule under the authority in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. The Coast Guard was notified of these vessels' transit and cargo on December 12, 2024. There is insufficient time to publish an NPRM before this operation because the security zone must be established by December 20, 2024, to ensure security of the vessels and the surrounding area and there is insufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and to consider those comments before issuing the rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> . Delaying the effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest because quick action is needed to provide for the security of this vessel and its surroundings while it is in transit. <HD SOURCE="HD1">III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule</HD> The Coast Guard is issuing this security zone regulation under the authority in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and 70124. The Captain of the Port, Sector Corpus Christi (COTP) has determined that potential hazards are associated with the transit of the Motor Vessel (M/V) ARC INDEPENDENCE. There is a security concern within a 500-yard radius of the vessel when it's loaded and transiting while loaded. This rule is needed to provide for the safety and security of the vessel, its cargo, and the surrounding waterway from terrorist acts, sabotage, or other subversive acts, accidents, or other events of a similar nature while the vessel is transiting within Corpus Christi, TX. <HD SOURCE="HD1">IV. Discussion of the Rule</HD> The Coast Guard is establishing a 500-yard radius, temporary, moving security zone around M/V ARC INDEPENDENCE. Other mariners and vessels will be able to identify the security zone because the M/V ARC INDEPENDENCE's name is clearly marked on its stern, and port and starboard sides. The zone for the vessel will be effective from December 20, 2024, through December 27, 2024, and will be enforced when the vessel is loaded and transiting the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. The security zone will be enforced to protect the vessel, its cargo, and the surrounding waterways from terrorist acts, sabotage, or other subversive acts, accidents, or other events of a similar nature while the vessel is traveling within the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the security zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. As used in this section, “designated representative” means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port, USCG Sector Corpus Christi (COTP) in the enforcement of the security zone. Persons or vessels desiring to enter or pass through each zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated representative on VHF-FM channel 16 or by telephone at 361-939-0450. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the COTP or designated representative. The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to Mariners and Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as appropriate for the enforcement times and dates for the security zone. <HD SOURCE="HD1">V. Regulatory Analyses</HD> We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. <HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Regulatory Planning and Review</HD> Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this rule is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration, and location of the security zone. This rule will impact a small, designated area of 500-yards around the moving vessel in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel as the vessel transits the channel over a period of approximately four hours or less. Most vessels will be able to move around the security zone and therefore the impediment to the movement of other vessels will be minimal. Moreover, the rule allows other vessels to seek permission to enter the zone. <HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Impact on Small Entities</HD> The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the temporary security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the <E T="02">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT</E> section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. <HD SOURCE="HD2">C. Collection of Information</HD> This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). <HD SOURCE="HD2">D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments</HD> A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 16k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.