← All FR Documents ·← Back to 2025-17302
Proposed Rule

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Osprey, FL

In Plain English

What is this Federal Register notice?

This is a proposed rule published in the Federal Register by Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard. Proposed rules invite public comment before becoming final, legally binding regulations.

Is this rule final?

No. This is a proposed rule. It has not yet been finalized and is subject to revision based on public comments.

Who does this apply to?

Consult the full text of this document for specific applicability provisions. The affected parties depend on the regulatory scope defined within.

When does it take effect?

No specific effective date is indicated. Check the full text for date provisions.

📋 Rulemaking Status

This is a proposed rule. A final rule may be issued after the comment period and agency review.

Regulatory History — 64 documents in this rulemaking

  1. Jan 24, 2024 2024-01359 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Housatonic River, Stratford, CT
  2. Jan 24, 2024 2024-01358 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Saugatuck River, Westport, CT
  3. Jan 24, 2024 2024-01360 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mianus River, Greenwich, CT
  4. Feb 2, 2024 2024-02084 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Jupiter, FL
  5. Feb 5, 2024 2024-02187 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL
  6. Feb 21, 2024 2024-03455 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Reynolds Channel, Atlantic Beach, NY
  7. Feb 23, 2024 2024-03462 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Sloop Channel, Nassau County, NY
  8. Feb 23, 2024 2024-03463 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Long Creek, Nassau County, NY
  9. Feb 29, 2024 2024-04274 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Ashtabula River, Ashtabula, OH
  10. Feb 29, 2024 2024-04273 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; River Rouge, Detroit, MI; Correction
  11. Mar 8, 2024 2024-05007 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria Island and Byron...
  12. Mar 8, 2024 2024-04952 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Portage River, Port Clinton, OH
  13. Apr 8, 2024 2024-07366 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Milwaukee, Menomonee, and Kinnikinnic Rivers...
  14. Apr 8, 2024 2024-07368 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Black River, Lorain, OH
  15. Apr 8, 2024 2024-07367 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Maumee River, Toledo, OH
  16. Apr 10, 2024 2024-07578 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Umpqua River, Reedsport, OR
  17. May 7, 2024 2024-09922 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Reynolds Channel, Atlantic Beach, NY
  18. May 20, 2024 2024-10980 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; West Palm Be...
  19. May 28, 2024 2024-11608 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
  20. May 31, 2024 2024-11837 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Sloop Channel, Nassau County, NY
  21. Jun 21, 2024 2024-13472 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Townsend Gut, Southport, ME
  22. Jul 2, 2024 2024-14545 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Three Mile Slough, Near Rio Vista, CA
  23. Jul 15, 2024 2024-15233 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Miami River, North Fork, Miami, FL
  24. Jul 31, 2024 2024-16824 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Rancocas Creek, Burlington County, NJ
  25. Aug 7, 2024 2024-17452 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL
  26. Sep 3, 2024 2024-19697 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL; Correction
  27. Sep 26, 2024 2024-21971 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Milwaukee, Menomonee, and Kinnikinnic Rivers...
  28. Oct 3, 2024 2024-22822 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hackensack River, Little Snake Hill, NJ
  29. Oct 15, 2024 2024-23769 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Wappinger Creek, New Hamburg, New York
  30. Oct 16, 2024 2024-23738 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Townsend Gut, Southport, ME
  31. Oct 25, 2024 2024-24711 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Jupiter, FL
  32. Oct 25, 2024 2024-24847 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Beaufort, SC
  33. Oct 30, 2024 2024-24970 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Dutch Kills, Queens County, NY
  34. Nov 4, 2024 2024-25603 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Sacramento River, Rio Vista, CA
  35. Nov 6, 2024 2024-25660 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; West Palm Be...
  36. Jan 8, 2025 2024-31328 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Osprey, FL
  37. Jan 17, 2025 2025-00573 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Umpqua River, Reedsport, OR
  38. Feb 7, 2025 2025-02368 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL
  39. Mar 24, 2025 2025-04917 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Sandusky Bay, Sandusky, OH
  40. Mar 25, 2025 2025-04918 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL
  41. Mar 26, 2025 2025-05091 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Hackensack River, Little Snake Hill, NJ
  42. Apr 4, 2025 2025-05748 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Miami River, North Fork, Miami, FL
  43. Apr 4, 2025 2025-05778 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Osprey, FL
  44. Apr 7, 2025 2025-05875 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Honker Cut, Between Empire Tract and King Is...
  45. Apr 17, 2025 2025-06394 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic River, Harrison, New Jersey
  46. Apr 24, 2025 2025-07058 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; West Palm Be...
  47. May 19, 2025 2025-08888 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL; Extension o...
  48. May 20, 2025 2025-08990 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Beaufort, SC
  49. Jun 9, 2025 2025-10418 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Inside Thorofare, Ventnor City, New Jersey
  50. Jun 23, 2025 2025-11495 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; East River, Green Bay, WI
  51. Jul 24, 2025 2025-13882 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Fort Lauderd...
  52. Aug 1, 2025 2025-14593 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River, Ches...
  53. Sep 9, 2025 2025-17302 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, North Myrtle...
  54. Sep 16, 2025 2025-17888 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Okeechobee Waterway, Stuart, FL
  55. Oct 1, 2025 2025-19114 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Canaveral Barge Canal, Port Canaveral, FL
  56. Nov 18, 2025 2025-20164 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Newark Bay, Between the City of Newark and C...
  57. Nov 24, 2025 2025-20726 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Bass River, Beverly, MA
  58. Nov 26, 2025 2025-21198 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Wishkah River, Aberdeen, WA
  59. Dec 1, 2025 2025-21670 Proposed Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic River, Between the City of Newark an...
  60. Jan 20, 2026 2026-00931 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, North Myrtle...
  61. Jan 20, 2026 2026-00932 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Fort Lauderd...
  62. Jan 26, 2026 2026-01398 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Inside Thorofare, Ventnor City, New Jersey
  63. Jan 26, 2026 2026-01400 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Technical Amendment; Removal of Obsolete Dra...
  64. Feb 3, 2026 2026-02175 Final Rule
    Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New Rochelle Harbor, Westchester County, NY

Document Details

Document Number2024-31328
TypeProposed Rule
PublishedJan 8, 2025
Effective Date-
RIN1625-AA09
Docket IDDocket No. USCG-2024-0628
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

Related Documents (by RIN/Docket)

Doc #TypeTitlePublished
2026-02175 Final Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; New Roc... Feb 3, 2026
2026-01398 Final Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Inside ... Jan 26, 2026
2026-01400 Final Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Technic... Jan 26, 2026
2026-00931 Final Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlanti... Jan 20, 2026
2026-00932 Final Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlanti... Jan 20, 2026
2025-21670 Proposed Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic... Dec 1, 2025
2025-21198 Proposed Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Wishkah... Nov 26, 2025
2025-20726 Final Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Bass Ri... Nov 24, 2025
2025-20164 Proposed Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Newark ... Nov 18, 2025
2025-19114 Final Rule Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Canaver... Oct 1, 2025

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutable—once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

Full Document Text (2,950 words · ~15 min read)

Text Preserved
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY <SUBAGY>Coast Guard</SUBAGY> <CFR>33 CFR Part 117</CFR> <DEPDOC>[Docket No. USCG-2024-0628]</DEPDOC> <RIN>RIN 1625-AA09</RIN> <SUBJECT>Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Osprey, FL</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Coast Guard, DHS. <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Notice of proposed rulemaking. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that governs the Blackburn Point Bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GICW), mile 63.1, at Osprey, FL. The Casey Key Association has requested the Coast Guard consider changing the operating schedule to reduce drawbridge openings during the weekday peak traffic periods to assist with alleviating roadway congestion. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before February 7, 2025. </EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD> You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-2024-0628 using Federal Decision Making Portal at <E T="03">https://www.regulations.gov.</E> See the “Public Participation and Request for Comments” portion of the <E T="02">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION</E> section below for instructions on submitting comments. This notice of proposed rulemaking with its plain-language, 100-word-or-less proposed rule summary will be available in this same docket. <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge Management Specialist, Seventh Coast Guard District; telephone 571-607-5951, email <E T="03">Jennifer.N.Zercher@uscg.mil.</E> </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Table of Abbreviations </HD> <EXTRACT> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">CFR Code of Federal Regulations</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">DHS Department of Homeland Security</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">FR Federal Register</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">OMB Office of Management and Budget</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">§ Section </FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">U.S.C. United States Code</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">TD Temporary Deviation</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">FL Florida</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">GICW Gulf Intracoastal Waterway</FP> </EXTRACT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis</HD> Blackburn Point Bridge across the GICW, mile 63.1, at Osprey, FL, is a swing bridge with a 9-foot vertical clearance above mean high water when in the closed position. The existing regulation requires the bridge to open on demand any time a vessel requests an opening. The current regulation can be found in 33 CFR 117.5. On August 6, 2024, the Coast Guard published a temporary deviation entitled “Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Osprey, FL” in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> (89 FR 63815). That temporary deviation, effective from 7 a.m. on August 12, 2024, through 7 p.m. on January 31, 2025, allows Blackburn Point Bridge to operate with restricted, scheduled openings at peak traffic times during weekdays and operate on demand at all other times. This temporary deviation was authorized to test the impact of restricted opening on vessels and roadway traffic. The comment period for this temporary deviation ended September 20, 2024, with three comments received. The three comments received voiced concerns related to the proposed change. The first commentor stated that when the swing bridge was placed on a modified schedule last year to conduct emergency repairs, it caused unsafe conditions for vessels due to the number of waterway users and the restrictive nature of the waterway at the swing bridge. The modified schedule which the commentor was referring, was different than the currently proposed schedule. The previous modifications placed the swing bridge on a twice an hour opening schedule every day of the week, including the weekend. This proposed rule would allow mariners to request an opening three times an hour at designated times Monday through Friday during peak rush hours and would operate on demand all other times. The Coast Guard feels this purposed rule would allow for safe navigation while assisting with alleviating roadway congestion. The commentor also stated that roadway congestion is due to the bridge being a single-lane roadway passage which causes a pinch-point, and suggested the county consider widening or replacing the bridge. Sarasota County is considering replacing the swing bridge, but changes to the physical structure of the bridge are outside the scope of this rulemaking. The second commentor stated the proposed opening schedule provides no real relief to roadway traffic because it takes about ten minutes for the bridge to cycle. The Coast Guard has reviewed bridge logs. When one or two vessels are passing, the average opening time is five to seven minutes. When three or more vessels pass the average opening times is eight to twelve minutes. The Coast Guard has not received information supporting the statement the proposed schedule would not provide relief to roadway traffic. To the contrary, the county stated the proposed schedule is assisting with alleviating roadway congestion. The last commentor stated the swing bridge should remain required to open on demand because tidal movement and shallow water makes it dangerous to hold station while waiting on an opening. Again, this proposed rule would allow mariners to request an opening three times an hour at designated times Monday through Friday during peak rush hours and would operate on demand all other times. The Coast Guard feels this allows for safe navigation while assisting with alleviating roadway congestion. This NPRM will be open for public comment simultaneously with a Test Deviation under the same name and docket number. Both documents can be found at <E T="03">https://www.regulations.gov</E> and comments can be made to either document. <HD SOURCE="HD1">III. Discussion of Proposed Rule</HD> The current operating schedule allows the Blackburn Point Bridge to open on demand for marine traffic. Under this proposed rule, the swing bridge will open at the top of the hour, 20 minutes past the hour and 40 minutes past the hour, Monday through Friday between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. At all other times the swing bridge will open on demand. This will assist with alleviating roadway congestion during the weekday and allow for on demand openings in the evenings and weekends. Vessels that can pass beneath the bridge without an opening may do so at any time. Emergency vessels and tugs with tows can still request an opening at any time. This proposed rule would add one new special requirement to section 117.287 for the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, the Blackburn Point Bridge at Osprey, FL. Additionally, this proposed rule will republish section 117.287 to reorganize the paragraph structure to follow current regulatory drafting requirements. <HD SOURCE="HD1">IV. Regulatory Analyses</HD> We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders. <HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Regulatory Planning and Review</HD> Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This proposed rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that vessels can still transit the bridge during the designated times and vessels able to pass without an opening may do so at any time. <HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Impact on Small Entities</HD> The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator <E T="03">.</E> If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see <E T="02">ADDRESSES</E> ) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the <E T="02">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT</E> section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 20k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.