Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders

<NOTICE> DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE <SUBAGY>International Trade Administration</SUBAGY> <DEPDOC>[A-201-853; C-201-854]</DEPDOC> <SUBJECT>Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> In response to requests from Keysteel Corp., Mid-South Wire Company, National Wire LLC, Oklahoma Steel & Wire Co., and Wire Mesh Corp. (collectively, the requesters), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating a country-wide circumvention inquiry to determine whether standard steel welded wire mesh (wire mesh) from Mexico, which is completed in the United States from low-carbon steel wire produced in Mexico, is circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on wire mesh from Mexico. </SUM> <DATES> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> Applicable January 14, 2025. </DATES> <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> Benjamin Nathan, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3834. </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">Background</HD> On November 5, 2024, pursuant to section 781(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.226(h), the requesters filed circumvention inquiry requests alleging that wire mesh completed in the United States using low-carbon steel wire manufactured in Mexico is circumventing the AD and CVD <E T="03">Orders</E>   <SU>1</SU> <FTREF/> on wire mesh from Mexico and, accordingly, should be included within the scope of the <E T="03">Orders.</E> <SU>2</SU> <FTREF/> On November 29, 2024, Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V., a Mexican producer of wire mesh, and its subsidiary Deacero USA, Inc. (collectively, Deacero), filed comments opposing the requesters' requests. <SU>3</SU> <FTREF/> On December 6, 2024, the requesters filed rebuttal comments to Deacero's November 29, 2024 comments. <SU>4</SU> <FTREF/> <FTNT> <SU>1</SU>   <E T="03">See Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico: Antidumping Duty Order,</E> 86 FR 43525 (August 9, 2021); <E T="03">see also Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico: Countervailing Duty Order,</E> 86 FR 18940 (April 12, 2021) (collectively, <E T="03">Orders</E> ). </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>2</SU>   <E T="03">See</E> Requesters' Letter, “Petitioners' Request for Circumvention Ruling Pursuant to Section 781(a) of the Act,” dated November 5, 2024 (Circumvention Request). </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>3</SU>   <E T="03">See</E> Deacero's Letter, “Response in Opposition to Request for Anti-Circumvention Ruling,” dated November 29, 2024. </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>4</SU>   <E T="03">See</E> Requesters' Letter, “Petitioners' Reply to Deacero's Comments on Petitioners' Request for Circumvention Inquiry,” dated December 6, 2024. </FTNT> On December 4, 2024, we extended the deadline to initiate this circumvention inquiry by 30 days, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.226(d)(1). <SU>5</SU> <FTREF/> <FTNT> <SU>5</SU>   <E T="03">See</E> Memorandum, “Extension of Circumvention Inquiry Initiation Deadline,” dated December 4, 2024. </FTNT> On December 10, 2024, we issued a questionnaire to the requesters. <SU>6</SU> <FTREF/> Subsequently, on December 12, 2024, the requesters filed their response to our request for information. <SU>7</SU> <FTREF/> <FTNT> <SU>6</SU>   <E T="03">See</E> Commerce's Letter, “Supplemental Initiation Questionnaire,” dated December 10, 2024 (Request for Information). </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>7</SU>   <E T="03">See</E> Requesters' Letter, “Petitioners' Supplemental Questionnaire Response,” dated December 12, 2024. </FTNT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">Scope of the Orders</HD> The merchandise covered by the scope of the <E T="03">Orders</E> is wire mesh from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope of <E T="03">Orders, see</E> the Circumvention Initiation Checklist. <SU>8</SU> <FTREF/> <FTNT> <SU>8</SU>  For a complete description of the scope of the <E T="03">Orders, see</E> Checklist, “Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders,” dated concurrently with this notice (Circumvention Initiation Checklist). </FTNT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">Merchandise Subject to the Circumvention Inquiry</HD> This circumvention inquiry covers low-carbon steel wire produced in Mexico and further processed and completed in the United States into wire mesh from Mexico. <HD SOURCE="HD1">Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry</HD> Section 351.226(d) of Commerce's regulations states that if Commerce determines that a request for a circumvention inquiry satisfies the requirements of 19 CFR 351.226(c), then Commerce “will accept the request and initiate a circumvention inquiry.” Section 351.226(c)(1) of Commerce's regulations, in turn, requires that each circumvention inquiry request allege “that the elements necessary for a circumvention determination under section 781 of the Act exist” and be “accompanied by information reasonably available to the interested party supporting these allegations.” The requesters alleged circumvention pursuant to section 781(a) of the Act ( <E T="03">i.e.,</E> merchandise completed or assembled in the United States). Section 781(a)(1) of the Act provides that Commerce may find circumvention of an order when merchandise of the same class or kind subject to the order is completed or assembled in the United States. In conducting a circumvention inquiry, under section 781(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce relies on the following criteria: (A) merchandise sold in the United States is of the same class or kind as any merchandise that is the subject of an AD or CVD order; (B) such merchandise sold in the United States is completed or assembled in the United States from parts or components produced in the foreign country with respect to which such order or finding applies; (C) the process of assembly or completion in the United States is minor or insignificant; and (D) the value of the parts or components referred to in subparagraph (B) is a significant portion of the total value of the merchandise. In determining whether the process of assembly or completion in the United States is minor or insignificant under section 781(a)(1)(C) of the Act, section 781(a)(2) of the Act directs Commerce to consider: (A) the level of investment in the United States; (B) the level of research and development in the United States; (C) the nature of the production process in the United States; (D) the extent of production facilities in the United States; and (E) whether the value of the processing performed in the United States represents a small proportion of the value of the merchandise sold in the United States. However, no single factor, by itself, controls Commerce's determination of whether the process of assembly or completion in the United States is minor or insignificant. <SU>9</SU> <FTREF/> Accordingly, it is Commerce's practice to evaluate each of these five factors as they exist in the United States, and to reach an affirmative or negative circumvention determination based on the totality of the circumstances of the particular circumvention inquiry. <SU>10</SU> <FTREF/> <FTNT> <SU>9</SU>   <E T="03">See</E> Statement of Administrative Action Accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, H.R. Doc. No. 103-316, Vol. 1 (1994) (SAA), at 893. </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>10</SU>   <E T="03">See Antidumping Duty Order on Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Circumvention with Respect to R-410B, R-407G, and a Certain Custom Blend from the People's Republic of China,”</E> 89 FR 25568 (April 11, 2024), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, unchanged in <E T="03">Antidumping Order on Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention With Respect to R-410B, R-407G, and a Certain Custom Blend from the People's Republic of China,</E> 89 FR 56848 (July 11, 2024. </FTNT> In addition, section 781(a)(3) of the Act sets forth additional factors to consider in determining whether to include merchandise assembled or completed in the United States within the scope of an AD or CVD order. Specifically, Commerce shall take into account such factors as: (A) the pattern of trade, including sourcing patterns; (B) whether the manufacturer or exporter of the parts or components is affiliated with the person who assembles or completes the merchandise sold in the United States from the parts or components produced in the foreign country with respect to which the order applies; and (C) whether imports into the United States of the parts or components products in such foreign country have increased after the initiation of the investigation which resulted in the issuance of such order. <HD SOURCE="HD1">Analysis</HD> Based on our analysis of the requesters' circumvention request, Commerce determines that the requesters have satisfied the criteria under 19 CFR 351.226(c) to warrant the initiation of circumvention inquiries of the <E T="03">Orders.</E> For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to initiate these circumvention inquiries, <E T="03">see</E> the Circumvention Initiation Checklist. <SU>11</SU> <FTREF/> As explained in the Circumvention Initiation Checklist, the information provided by the requesters warrants initiating these circumvention inquiries on a country-wide basis. Commerce has taken this approach in prior circumvention inquiries, where the fa ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 15k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━