<RULE>
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
<CFR>10 CFR Part 205</CFR>
<DEPDOC>[DOE-HQ-2025-0011]</DEPDOC>
<RIN>RIN 1901-AB68</RIN>
<SUBJECT>Application for Presidential Permit Authorizing the Construction, Connection, Operation, and Maintenance of Facilities for Transmission of Electric Energy at International Boundaries</SUBJECT>
<HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD>
Department of Energy (DOE); Grid Deployment Office.
<HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD>
Direct final rule (“DFR”); request for comments.
<SUM>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD>
This DFR rescinds regulations regarding the applications for a presidential permit authorizing construction, connection, operation, and maintenance of facilities for transmission of electric energy at international boundaries.
</SUM>
<EFFDATE>
<HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD>
The final rule is effective July 15, 2025, unless significant adverse comments are received by June 16, 2025. Significant adverse comments oppose the rule and raise, alone or in combination, a serious enough issue related to each of the independent grounds for the rule that a substantive response is required. If significant adverse comments are received, notice will be published in the
<E T="04">Federal Register</E>
before the effective date either withdrawing the rule or issuing a new final rule which responds to significant adverse comments.
</EFFDATE>
<HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD>
Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
<E T="03">www.regulations.gov</E>
under docket number DOE-HQ-2025-0011. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. The docket for this final rule, which includes
<E T="04">Federal Register</E>
notices, comments, and other supporting documents and materials, is available for review at
<E T="03">www.regulations.gov.</E>
All documents in the docket are listed in the
<E T="03">www.regulations.gov</E>
index. However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure. The docket web page can be found at
<E T="03">www.regulations.gov/docket/DOE-HQ-2025-0011.</E>
The docket web page contains instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments, in the docket, as well as a summary.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4), a summary of this rule may be found at
<E T="03">regulations.gov,</E>
under the docket number.
<FURINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD>
Mr. David Taggart, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC-1, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-5281. Email:
<E T="03">DOEGeneralCounsel@hq.doe.gov.</E>
</FURINF>
<SUPLINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Table of Contents</HD>
<EXTRACT>
<FP SOURCE="FP-2">I. General Discussion</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP-2">II. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">A. Review Under Executive Orders 12866</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">E. Review Under Executive Order 13132</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">F. Review Under Executive Order 12988</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">I. Review Under Executive Order 12630</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">K. Review Under Executive Order 13211</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">L. Review Under Additional Executive Orders and Presidential Memoranda</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP1-2">M. Congressional Notification</FP>
<FP SOURCE="FP-2">III. Approval of the Secretary</FP>
</EXTRACT>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">I. General Discussion</HD>
DOE is rescinding the application process codified in 10 CFR 205.320 through 10 CFR 205.329. Authority for these sections can be found at E.O. 10485 as amended by E.O. 12038. Extensive regulations established in response to these EOs impose economic, administrative and procedural burdens on applicants. Such burdens impede private enterprise and entrepreneurship and run contrary to the President's goal of unleashing American energy. E.O. 14154.
Further, Executive Order 14192 Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation explicitly makes it “the policy of the executive branch . . . to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens placed on the American people.” Such burdens “are often difficult for the average person or business to understand, as they require synthesizing the collective meaning not just of formal regulations but also rules, memoranda, administrative orders, guidance documents, policy statements, and interagency agreements that are not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act, further increasing compliance costs and the risk of costs of non-compliance.”
<E T="03">Id.</E>
The Secretary is therefore proposing to reduce regulatory burden wherever possible.
Additionally, as the authority for the aforementioned sections rests in Executive Order, it is at the discretion of the Executive branch as to how the order is applied.
Accordingly, DOE removes the aforementioned sections from regulation to reduce burden and remove out of date requirements while simultaneously bolstering American energy dominance by reducing barriers in the construction of facilities on the border. The rule rescission should help increase exports and subsequently the reliance of foreign nations on American energy. DOE seeks comment on all aspects of the rule, including but not limited to the prior rule's consistency with statutory authority and the Constitution, national security, whether the prior rules are out of date, the prior rule's costs and benefits, and the prior rule's effect on small business, entrepreneurship and private enterprise.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Review Under Executive Orders 12866</HD>
Executive Order (“E.O.”) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” requires agencies, to the extent permitted by law, to (1) propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs; (2) tailor regulations to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives, taking into account, among other things, and to the extent practicable, the costs of cumulative regulations; (3) select, in choosing among alternative regulatory
approaches, those approaches that maximize net benefits; (4) to the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than specifying the behavior or manner of compliance that regulated entities must adopt; and (5) identify and assess available alternatives to direct regulation, including providing economic incentives to encourage the desired behavior, such as user fees or marketable permits, or providing information upon which choices can be made by the public. For the reasons set forth herein, this regulatory action is consistent with these principles.
<HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act</HD>
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
<E T="03">et seq.</E>
) requires preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (“IRFA”) and a final regulatory flexibility analysis (“FRFA”) for any rule that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required by E.O. 13272, “Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking,” 67 FR 53461 (Aug. 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly considered during the rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and policies available on the Office of the General Counsel's website (
<E T="03">www.energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel</E>
).
DOE reviewed the amendment under the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the policies and procedures published on February 19, 2003. This rule eliminates requirements. Therefore, DOE concludes that the impacts thereof would not have a “significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,” and that the preparation of an IRFA is not warranted. DOE will transmit this certification and supporting statement of factual basis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for review under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
<HD SOURCE="HD2">C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act</HD>
This amendment imposes no new information or record-keeping requirements. Accordingly, OMB clearance is not required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. (44 U.S.C. 3501
<E T="03">et seq.</E>
).
<HD SOURCE="HD2">D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969</HD>
DOE has analyzed this action in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, (“NEPA”) and DOE's NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR part 1021). DOE's regulations include a categorical exclusion for rulemakings that are strictly procedural. See 10 CFR part 1021, subpart D, appendix A6. DOE has determined that this rulemaking qualifies for categorical exclusion A6 because it is a strictly procedural rulemaking.
<HD SOURCE="HD2">E. Review Under Executive Order 13132</HD>
E.O. 13132, “Federalism,” 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999), imposes certain requirements on Federal agencies formulating and implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to examine t
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Preview showing 10k of 21k characters.
Full document text is stored and available for version comparison.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.