← Back to FR Documents
Proposed Rule

Rescinding Regulations Regarding Management Systems Pertaining to the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Refuge Roads Program

Notice of proposed rulemaking.

📖 Research Context From Federal Register API

Summary:

FHWA proposes to rescind the regulations issued on February 27, 2004, Federal Lands Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Fish and Wildlife and the Refuge Roads Program.

Key Dates
Citation: 90 FR 22887
Comments must be received on or before June 30, 2025.
Comments closed: June 30, 2025
Public Participation
Topics:
Bridges Grant programs-transportation Highways and roads Public lands Transportation

In Plain English

What is this Federal Register notice?

This is a proposed rule published in the Federal Register by Transportation Department, Federal Highway Administration. Proposed rules invite public comment before becoming final, legally binding regulations.

Is this rule final?

No. This is a proposed rule. It has not yet been finalized and is subject to revision based on public comments.

Who does this apply to?

Notice of proposed rulemaking.

When does it take effect?

Comments must be received on or before June 30, 2025.

📋 Rulemaking Status

This is a proposed rule. A final rule may be issued after the comment period and agency review.

Document Details

Document Number2025-09723
FR Citation90 FR 22887
TypeProposed Rule
PublishedMay 30, 2025
Effective Date-
RIN2125-AG23
Docket IDDocket Number FHWA-2025-0017
Pages22887–22889 (3 pages)
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

Related Documents (by RIN/Docket)

Doc #TypeTitlePublished
2025-18194 Final Rule Rescinding Regulations Regarding Managem... Sep 19, 2025

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutable—once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

Full Document Text (1,988 words · ~10 min read)

Text Preserved
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <SUBAGY>Federal Highway Administration</SUBAGY> <CFR>23 CFR Part 972</CFR> <DEPDOC>[Docket Number FHWA-2025-0017]</DEPDOC> <RIN>RIN 2125-AG23</RIN> <SUBJECT>Rescinding Regulations Regarding Management Systems Pertaining to the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Refuge Roads Program</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT). <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Notice of proposed rulemaking. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> FHWA proposes to rescind the regulations issued on February 27, 2004, Federal Lands Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Fish and Wildlife and the Refuge Roads Program. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> Comments must be received on or before June 30, 2025. </EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD> Mail or hand deliver comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, or submit electronically at <E T="03">www.regulations.gov.</E> All comments should include the docket number that appears in the heading of this document. All comments received will be available for examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring notification of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard or may print the acknowledgment page that appears after submitting comments electronically. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the <E T="04">Federal Register</E> published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages 19477-78) or you may visit <E T="03">www.regulations.gov.</E> <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> Corey Bobba, Office of Federal Lands, (202) 366-9489, <E T="03">corey.bobba@dot.gov;</E> or David Serody, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-4241, <E T="03">david.serody@dot.gov,</E> Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">Electronic Access and Filing</HD> This document and all comments received may be viewed online at <E T="03">www.regulations.gov</E> using the docket number listed above. Electronic retrieval assistance and guidelines are available on the website. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded from the Office of <E T="04">Federal Register</E> 's website at <E T="03">www.federalregister.gov</E> and the U.S. Government Publishing Office's website at <E T="03">www.GovInfo.gov.</E> <HD SOURCE="HD1">I. General Discussion</HD> Through this proposed rule, FHWA proposes to rescind the rule issued on February 27, 2004, Federal Lands Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Refuge Roads Program, via 69 FR 9483, amending 23 CFR part 972. The rule provided for the development and implementation of safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for transportation facilities serving the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System) funded under the Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP) as required by the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) (Pub. L. 105-178) (June 9, 1998). For the reasons explained below, FHWA has determined that this part is unnecessary and will rescind it in full. Section 1115(d)(1) of TEA-21 amended the version of 23 U.S.C. 204 that existed at the time to add a paragraph (a)(6) stating: “The Secretary and the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency shall, to the extent appropriate, develop by rule safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for roads funded under the Federal lands highway program.” The roads funded under the FLHP included Refuge Roads. Through 23 CFR part 972, FHWA addressed the management systems for the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Refuge Roads programs. <E T="03">See</E> 69 FR 9484. On July 6, 2012, Congress enacted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (Pub. L. 112-141). Section 1119(a) of MAP-21 removed the FLHP under 23 U.S.C. 204, replacing that program with the Tribal Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 202), the Federal Lands Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 203), and the Federal Lands Access Program (23 U.S.C. 204). In doing so, Congress repealed the previous version of 23 U.S.C. 204(a)(6) and replaced it with a similar provision at 23 U.S.C. 201(c)(5), which has remained unchanged. Under that provision, FHWA “and the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency shall, to the extent appropriate, implement safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for facilities funded under the tribal transportation program and the Federal lands transportation program in support of asset management.” The FHWA first notes that the current regulations have become outdated due to subsequent statutory changes, and FHWA has issued more up-to-date guidance. <SU>1</SU> <FTREF/> For instance, the definition of the Refuge Roads Program in § 972.104 refers to the “funds allocated each fiscal year, as described in 23 U.S.C. 202(e) and 23 U.S.C. 204(k).” This refers to the requirements that existed prior to the enactment of MAP-21, where Congress appropriated funds specifically for Refuge Roads as part of the FLHP under 23 U.S.C. 204, which FHWA then allocated pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 202. <FTNT> <SU>1</SU>   <E T="03">https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/transportation.</E> </FTNT> In considering the changes to be made to 23 CFR part 972, FHWA is guided by the Secretary of Transportation's new policy to reduce regulatory burdens wherever possible. Under that policy, unless a regulatory standard is required by statute, the Secretary proposes eliminating that requirement. In accordance with that policy, FHWA finds it significant that Congress, in enacting MAP-21, retained the same general requirements for asset management in 23 U.S.C. 201(c)(5) but replaced the phrase “develop by rule” with the word “implement.” To the extent that FHWA and Federal land management agencies agree that safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems are appropriate for certain facilities, FHWA believes such systems can be implemented without the need for regulations. The FHWA seeks comment on any reasons to rescind or not to rescind these regulations. <HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures</HD> This proposed rule does not meet the criteria of a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended by Executive Orders 14215 and 13563. Therefore, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this proposed rule under those orders. This proposed rule would rescind outdated regulations regarding asset management. It could result in some cost savings for the FWS, but FHWA does not have the data to estimate the reduction in costs that would result from this NPRM. The Agency requests comment on any impacts that could result from removing the provisions identified in this NPRM. These changes would not adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere with any action taken or planned by another agency and would not materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not required. <HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)</HD> This proposed rule is not an E.O. 14192 regulatory action. This rulemaking would not adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere with any action taken or planned by another agency and would not materially alter the budgetary impacts of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not required. <HD SOURCE="HD2">C. Regulatory Flexibility Act</HD> Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; 5 U.S.C. 601 <E T="03">et seq.</E> ), agencies must prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities ( <E T="03">i.e.,</E> small businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions). No regulatory flexibility analysis is required, however, if the head of an agency or an appropriate designee certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. FHWA has concluded and hereby certifies that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; therefore, an analysis is not included. This proposed rule would only remove regulations governing management systems that guide the Forest Service in developing transportation plans and making resource allocation decisions. <HD SOURCE="HD2">D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act</HD> This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4, 10 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 14k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.