DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
<SUBAGY>Federal Highway Administration</SUBAGY>
<CFR>23 CFR Part 973</CFR>
<DEPDOC>[Docket Number FHWA-2025-0018]</DEPDOC>
<RIN>RIN 2125-AG24</RIN>
<SUBJECT>Rescinding Regulations Regarding Management Systems Pertaining to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Indian Reservation Roads Program</SUBJECT>
<HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD>
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
<HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD>
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
<SUM>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD>
FHWA proposes to rescind the regulations issued on February 27, 2004, Federal Lands Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Indian Reservation Roads Program.
</SUM>
<EFFDATE>
<HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD>
Comments must be received on or before June 30, 2025.
</EFFDATE>
<HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD>
Mail or hand deliver comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Dockets Management Facility, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, or submit electronically at
<E T="03">www.regulations.gov.</E>
All comments should include the docket number that appears in the heading of this document. All comments received will be available for examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring notification of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard or may print the acknowledgment page that appears after submitting comments electronically. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
<E T="04">Federal Register</E>
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit
<E T="03">www.regulations.gov.</E>
<FURINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD>
For questions about this proposed rule, please contact Corey Bobba, Office of Federal Lands Highways, (202) 366-9489,
<E T="03">corey.bobba@dot.gov.</E>
For legal questions, please contact Mr. David Serody, FHWA Office of Chief Counsel, 202-366-4241, or via email at
<E T="03">David.Serody@dot.gov.</E>
Office hours for FHWA are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., eastern time (E.T.), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
</FURINF>
<SUPLINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Electronic Access and Filing</HD>
This document and all comments received may be viewed online at
<E T="03">www.regulations.gov</E>
using the docket number listed above. Electronic retrieval assistance and guidelines are available on the website. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded from the Office of Federal Register's website at
<E T="03">www.federalregister.gov</E>
and the U.S. Government Publishing Office's website at
<E T="03">www.GovInfo.gov.</E>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">I. General Discussion</HD>
Through this proposed rule, FHWA proposes to rescind the rule issued on February 27, 2004, Federal Lands Highway Program; Management Systems Pertaining to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Indian Reservation Roads Program, via 69 FR 9490, amending 23 CFR part 973. The rule provided for the development and implementation of safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for transportation facilities providing access to Indian lands and funded under the Federal Lands Highway Program (FLHP) as required by the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) (Pub. L. 105-178) (June 9, 1998). For the reasons explained below, FHWA has determined that this part is unnecessary and will rescind it in full.
Section 1115(d)(1) of TEA-21 amended the version of 23 U.S.C. 204 that existed at the time to add a paragraph (a)(6) stating: “The Secretary and the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency shall, to the extent appropriate, develop by rule safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for roads funded under the Federal lands highway program.” The roads funded under the FLHP included Indian Reservation Roads. Through 23 CFR part 973, FHWA addressed the management systems for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Indian Reservation Roads program.
<E T="03">See</E>
69 FR 9490-01.
On July 6, 2012, Congress enacted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (Pub. L. 112-141). Section 1119(a) of MAP-21 removed the FLHP under 23 U.S.C. 204, replacing that program with the Tribal Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 202), the Federal Lands Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. 203), and the Federal Lands Access Program (23 U.S.C. 204). In doing so, Congress repealed the previous version of 23 U.S.C. 204(a)(6) and replaced it with a similar provision at 23 U.S.C. 201(c)(5), which has remained unchanged. Under that provision, FHWA “and the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency shall, to the extent appropriate, implement safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for facilities funded under the tribal transportation program and the Federal lands transportation program in support of asset management.”
The FHWA first notes that the current regulations have become outdated due to subsequent statutory changes and has been superseded by the Tribal Transportation Program. For instance, the definition of the Indian Reservation Roads Program in § 973.104 refers to the “part of the FLHP established in 23 U.S.C. 204 to address the transportation needs of federally recognized” Indian Tribal Governments. This refers to the requirements that existed prior to the enactment of MAP-21, where Congress appropriated funds specifically for the Indian Reservation Roads Program as part of the FLHP under 23 U.S.C. 204.
In considering the changes to be made to 23 CFR part 973, FHWA is guided by the Secretary of Transportation's new policy to reduce regulatory burdens wherever possible. Under that policy, unless a regulatory standard is required by statute, the Secretary proposes eliminating that requirement. In accordance with that policy, FHWA finds it significant that Congress, in enacting MAP-21, retained the same general requirements for asset management in 23 U.S.C. 201(c)(5) but replaced the phrase “develop by rule” with the word “implement.” To the extent that FHWA and Federal land management agencies agree that safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems are appropriate for certain facilities, FHWA believes such systems can be implemented without the need for regulations. The FHWA seeks comment on any reasons to rescind or not to rescind these regulations.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures</HD>
This proposed rule does not meet the criteria of a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended by Executive Orders 14215 and 13563. Therefore, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this proposed rule under those orders.
This proposed rule would rescind outdated regulations regarding asset management. It could result in some cost savings for the BIA, but FHWA does not have the data to estimate the reduction in costs that would result from this NPRM. The Agency requests comment on any impacts that could result from removing the provisions identified in this NPRM.
These changes would not adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere with any action taken or planned by another agency and would not materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not required.
<HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)</HD>
This proposed rule is not an E.O. 14192 regulatory action. This rulemaking would not adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere with any action taken or planned by another agency and would not materially alter the budgetary impacts of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not required.
<HD SOURCE="HD2">C. Regulatory Flexibility Act</HD>
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; 5 U.S.C. 601
<E T="03">et seq.</E>
), agencies must prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (
<E T="03">i.e.,</E>
small businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions). No regulatory flexibility analysis is required, however, if the head of an agency or an appropriate designee certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. FHWA has concluded and hereby certifies that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; therefore, an analysis is not included. This proposed rule would only remove regulations governing management systems that guide the BIA in developing transportation plans and making resource allocation decisions.
<HD SOURCE="HD2">D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act</HD>
This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48) for State, local and Tribal
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Preview showing 10k of 14k characters.
Full document text is stored and available for version comparison.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.