← Back to FR Documents
Final Rule

Safety Zone; Milwaukee Air and Water Show, Milwaukee, WI

Final rule.

📖 Research Context From Federal Register API

Summary:

The Coast Guard is amending a published safety zone for certain waters of Lake Michigan encompassing the Milwaukee Air and Water Show to include an additional day. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters in the vicinity of McKinley Park and Bradford Beach, during this recurring event on the third weekend in July. This rulemaking prohibits persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan or a designated representative.

Key Dates
Citation: 90 FR 27238
This rule is effective July 28, 2025.
Public Participation
0 comments 1 supporting doc
View on Regulations.gov →
Topics:
Harbors Marine safety Navigation (water) Reporting and recordkeeping requirements Security measures Waterways

In Plain English

What is this Federal Register notice?

This is a final rule published in the Federal Register by Homeland Security Department, Coast Guard. Final rules have completed the public comment process and establish legally binding requirements.

Is this rule final?

Yes. This rule has been finalized. It has completed the notice-and-comment process required under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Who does this apply to?

Final rule.

When does it take effect?

This document has been effective since July 28, 2025.

📋 Related Rulemaking

This final rule likely has a preceding Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), but we haven't linked it yet.

Our system will automatically fetch and link related NPRMs as they're discovered.

Document Details

Document Number2025-11839
FR Citation90 FR 27238
TypeFinal Rule
PublishedJun 26, 2025
Effective DateJul 28, 2025
RIN1625-AA00
Docket IDDocket Number USCG-2025-0270
Pages27238–27241 (4 pages)
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

CFR References:

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

Related Documents (by RIN/Docket)

Doc #TypeTitlePublished
2026-02340 Final Rule Safety Zone; Saginaw River, Bay City, MI... Feb 6, 2026
2026-02203 Final Rule Safety Zone; Ice Accumulations; Alleghen... Feb 3, 2026
2026-01882 Proposed Rule Safety Zone; Inner Harbor, Baltimore, MD... Jan 30, 2026
2026-01316 Final Rule Safety Zone; St. Clair River, St. Clair,... Jan 23, 2026
2026-01168 Final Rule Safety Zone; Rocket Test Site, Rio Grand... Jan 22, 2026
2026-01064 Final Rule Safety Zone; Philippine Sea, Pacific Oce... Jan 21, 2026
2026-01070 Final Rule Fixed and Moving Safety Zone; Vicinity o... Jan 21, 2026
2026-00453 Final Rule Safety Zone; Plane Crash Response Betwee... Jan 13, 2026
2026-00326 Final Rule Safety Zone; Hillsborough Bay, Tampa, FL... Jan 12, 2026
2026-00176 Final Rule Fixed and Moving Safety Zone; Vicinity o... Jan 8, 2026

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutable—once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

Full Document Text (2,034 words · ~11 min read)

Text Preserved
<RULE> DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY <SUBAGY>Coast Guard</SUBAGY> <CFR>33 CFR Part 165</CFR> <DEPDOC>[Docket Number USCG-2025-0270]</DEPDOC> <RIN>RIN 1625-AA00</RIN> <SUBJECT>Safety Zone; Milwaukee Air and Water Show, Milwaukee, WI</SUBJECT> <HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD> Coast Guard, DHS. <HD SOURCE="HED">ACTION:</HD> Final rule. <SUM> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD> The Coast Guard is amending a published safety zone for certain waters of Lake Michigan encompassing the Milwaukee Air and Water Show to include an additional day. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters in the vicinity of McKinley Park and Bradford Beach, during this recurring event on the third weekend in July. This rulemaking prohibits persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan or a designated representative. </SUM> <EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD> This rule is effective July 28, 2025. </EFFDATE> <HD SOURCE="HED">ADDRESSES:</HD> To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to <E T="03">https://www.regulations.gov,</E> type USCG-2025-0270 in the search box and click “Search.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.” <FURINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD> If you have questions about this rule, call or email LCDR Jessica Anderson, Sector Lake Michigan Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 414-747-7182, email <E T="03">Jessica.P.Anderson@uscg.mil.</E> </FURINF> <SUPLINF> <HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Table of Abbreviations</HD> <EXTRACT> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">CFR Code of Federal Regulations</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">DHS Department of Homeland Security</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">FR Federal Register</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking</FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">§ Section </FP> <FP SOURCE="FP-1">U.S.C. United States Code</FP> </EXTRACT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Background Information and Regulatory History</HD> The Milwaukee Air and Water Show is a long-standing event that has occurred for 14 years. During that time, there have been numerous requests to establish a safety zone for four days in duration, rather than the three days currently enforced. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Sector Lake Michigan determined that, due to the repetitive requests, it was pertinent to revise the current safety zone in 33 CFR 165.929, table 4 to § 165.929, line No. 29 for the Milwaukee Air and Water Show to add a fourth day for the event. In response, on April, 8, 2025, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Milwaukee Air and Water Show, Milwaukee, WI. <SU>1</SU> <FTREF/> There we stated why we issued the NPRM and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this fireworks display. During the comment period that ended May 8, 2025, we received 4 comments, all in support of the additional day for enhanced safety. <FTNT> <SU>1</SU>  90 FR 15127. </FTNT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule</HD> The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The COTP Sector Lake Michigan determined that potential hazards were associated with the previously established safety zone in 33 CFR 165.929, table 4 to § 165.929, line No. 29 for the Milwaukee Air and Water Show that could be addressed through an additional day. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels and the navigable waters within an area approximately 5,000-yards by 1,500-yards before, during, and after the scheduled event, which required expanding the enforcement period to include four days. <HD SOURCE="HD1">IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule</HD> As noted above, we received 4 comments on our NPRM published April 8, 2025. All comments were in support of the proposed amendment. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM. This rule amended an established safety zone in 33 CFR 165.929, table 4 to § 165.929, line No. 29 for the Milwaukee Air and Water Show by adding a fourth day to the event. The Milwaukee Air and Water Show event is a recurring event held on the third weekend in July from 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. The safety zone covers all navigable waters of Lake Michigan in the vicinity of McKinley Park and Bradford Beach located within an area that is approximately 5,000 yards by 1,500 yards. The expanded duration of the zone ensures the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled Milwaukee Air and Water Show. No vessel or person is be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. <HD SOURCE="HD1">V. Regulatory Analyses</HD> We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders. <HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Regulatory Planning and Review</HD> Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation) directs agencies to significantly reduce the private expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations and provides that “any new incremental costs associated with new regulations shall, to the extent permitted by law, be offset by the elimination of existing costs associated with at least 10 prior regulations.” The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this rule a “significant regulatory action,” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it. This rule is not an Executive Order 14192 regulatory action because this rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866. <E T="03">See</E> OMB Memorandum M-25-20, “Guidance Implementing Section 3 of Executive Order 14192, titled ‘Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation’ ” (Mar. 26, 2025). This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, duration and time of day of the regulated area. This regulatory action determination is based on the previous rulemaking and the additional day not substantially altering the previous regulation. Additionally, prior events have included temporary final rules to encompass the four-day timeframe. <HD SOURCE="HD2">B. Impact on Small Entities</HD> The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the safety zone. The regulation will be in effect only during the event listed in this regulation for which the COTP has determined pose risks to the safety of life and property for the maritime public and event participants. The size, location, and duration of the regulation will be limited to the extent necessary to minimize these risks. Moreover, the COTP will make advance notice of the enforcement of the regulation through the Local Notice to Mariners and/or Broadcast Notice to Mariners. This regulation also provides a means for anyone needing to transit through or within the safety zone to seek permission from the COTP. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. <HD SOURCE="HD2">C. Collection of Information</HD> This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). <HD SOURCE="HD2">D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments</HD> A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 14k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.