← All FR Documents
Notice

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Complex Price Improvement Mechanism

In Plain English

What is this Federal Register notice?

This is a notice published in the Federal Register by Securities and Exchange Commission. Notices communicate information, guidance, or policy interpretations but may not create new binding obligations.

Is this rule final?

This document is classified as a notice. It may or may not create enforceable regulatory obligations depending on its specific content.

Who does this apply to?

Consult the full text of this document for specific applicability provisions. The affected parties depend on the regulatory scope defined within.

When does it take effect?

No specific effective date is indicated. Check the full text for date provisions.

Why it matters: This notice communicates agency policy or guidance regarding applicable regulations.

Document Details

Document Number2025-17814
TypeNotice
PublishedSep 16, 2025
Effective Date-
RIN-
Docket IDRelease No. 34-103951
Text FetchedYes

Agencies & CFR References

CFR References:
None

Linked CFR Parts

PartNameAgency
No linked CFR parts

Paired Documents

TypeProposedFinalMethodConf
No paired documents

External Links

⏳ Requirements Extraction Pending

This document's regulatory requirements haven't been extracted yet. Extraction happens automatically during background processing (typically within a few hours of document ingestion).

Federal Register documents are immutable—once extracted, requirements are stored permanently and never need re-processing.

Full Document Text (3,743 words · ~19 min read)

Text Preserved
<NOTICE> SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION <DEPDOC>[Release No. 34-103951; File No. SR-MRX-2025-19]</DEPDOC> <SUBJECT>Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Complex Price Improvement Mechanism</SUBJECT> <DATE>September 11, 2025.</DATE> Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), <SU>1</SU> <FTREF/> and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that on September 4, 2025, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (“MRX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. <FTNT> <SU>1</SU>  15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>2</SU>  17 CFR 240.19b-4. </FTNT> <HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change</HD> The Exchange proposes to amend the Complex Price Improvement Mechanism or “PIM” at Options 3, Section 13. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to make other amendments to Options 1, Section 1, Definitions; Options 3, Section 7, Types of Orders and Order and Quote Protocols; Options 3, Section 9, Trading Halts; Options 3, Section 10, Priority of Quotes and Orders; Options 3, Section 14, Complex Orders; Options 3, Section 16, Complex Order Risk Protections; Options 3, Section 20, Nullification and Adjustment of Options Transactions including Obvious Errors; and Options 7, Section 1, General Provisions. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at <E T="03">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/mrx/rulefilings,</E> and at the principal office of the Exchange. <HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change</HD> In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. <HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change</HD> <HD SOURCE="HD3">1. Purpose</HD> The Exchange proposes to amend the Complex Price Improvement Mechanism or “PIM” at Options 3, Section 13. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to make other amendments to Options 1, Section 1, Definitions; Options 3, Section 7, Types of Orders and Order and Quote Protocols; Options 3, Section 9, Trading Halts; Options 3, Section 10, Priority of Quotes and Orders; Options 3, Section 14, Complex Orders; Options 3, Section 16, Complex Order Risk Protections; Options 3, Section 20, Nullification and Adjustment of Options Transactions including Obvious Errors; and Options 7, Section 1, General Provisions. <HD SOURCE="HD3">Options 3, Section 13</HD> The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 13, Price Improvement Mechanism for Crossing Transactions. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 13(e)(5)(vii) to amend the manner in which an Agency Complex Order may execute. Today, if the Complex PIM execution price would be the same or better than a Complex Order on the Complex Order Book on the same side of the market as the Agency Complex Order, for options classes assigned to allocate in time priority or pro-rata pursuant to Options 3, Section 14(d)(2), the Agency Complex Order may be executed at a price that is equal to the resting Complex Order's limit price. The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 13(e)(5)(vii) to instead provide that the Agency Complex Order may be executed at a price that is at least one minimum price variation (as provided in Options 3, Section 14(c)(1)) better than the resting Complex Order's limit price. With this proposed change, the Exchange will require that the Agency Complex PIM Order receive one minimum price variation better than the resting Complex Order's limit price whereas today, the Agency Complex PIM Order would be permitted to execute at a price that is equal to the resting Complex Order's limit price. <SU>3</SU> <FTREF/> The Exchange believes that this amendment will prevent a Complex PIM order from executing at a price where there is a resting Complex Order on the same side of the market while still allowing a Complex PIM order to execute and potentially receive price improvement. This amendment is identical to Phlx Options 3, Section 13(b)(8). <SU>4</SU> <FTREF/> <FTNT> <SU>3</SU>  Options 3, Section 14(c)(1) provides that bids and offers for Complex Options Strategies may be expressed in one cent ($0.01) increments, and the options leg of Complex Options Strategies may be executed in one cent ($0.01) increments, regardless of the minimum increments otherwise applicable to the individual options legs of the order. Bids and offers for Stock-Option Strategies or Stock-Complex Strategies may be expressed in any decimal price determined by the Exchange, and the stock leg of a Stock-Option Strategy or Stock-Complex Strategy may be executed in any decimal price permitted in the equity market. The options leg of a Stock-Option Strategy or Stock-Complex Strategy may be executed in one cent ($0.01) increments, regardless of the minimum increments otherwise applicable to the individual options legs of the order. </FTNT> <FTNT> <SU>4</SU>  Phlx Options 3, Section 13(b)(8) was recently amended in SR-Phlx-2025-35. <E T="03">See</E> Securities Exchange Act Release No. 103667 (August 8, 2025), 90 FR 39042 (August 13, 2025) (SR-Phlx-2025-35) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend PIXL and Adopt New Auctions). </FTNT> In line with the amendment to Options 3, Section 13(e)(5)(vii), the Exchange also proposed to amend Options 3, Section 13(e)(5)(iv)(C) which currently states, “The exposure period will automatically terminate . . . (C) upon the receipt of a non-marketable Complex Order in the same complex strategy on the same side of the market as the Agency Complex Order that would cause the execution of the Agency Complex Order to be outside of the best bid or offer on the Complex Order Book . . . .” The Exchange proposes to instead provide, “. . . . upon the receipt of a non-marketable Complex Order in the same complex strategy on the same side of the market as the Agency Complex Order that would cause the execution of the Agency Complex Order to be <E T="03">at or</E> outside of the best bid or offer on the Complex Order Book.” Specifically, the addition of “at or” to the early termination provision will allow the Complex PIM Order to execute by early terminating the auction upon the receipt of a non-marketable Complex Order in the same complex strategy on the same side of the market as the Complex PIM Order that would cause the execution of the Complex PIM Order to be at or outside of the best bid or offer on the Complex Order Book. This change aligns with the Exchange's proposal at Options 3, Section 13(e)(5)(vii) that requires Complex PIM Orders to trade in at least one minimum price variation as provided in Options 3, Section 14(c)(1) better than the price of a Complex Order on the Complex Order Book on the same side of the market. Phlx has identical rule text at Options 3, Section 13(b)(2)(D)(2). <HD SOURCE="HD3">Other Rule Amendments</HD> The Exchange proposes to amend Options 1, Section 1(a)(12) to add the definition of conforming ratio. The term “conforming ratio” is where the ratio between the sizes of the options components of a Complex Order is equal to or greater than one-to-three (.333) and less than or equal to three-to-one (3.00). For example, a one-to-two (.5) ratio, a two-to-three (.667) ratio, or a two-to-one (2.00) ratio is a conforming ratio, whereas a one-to-four (.25) ratio or a four-to-one (4.0) ratio is not; where one component of the Complex Order is the underlying security, the ratio between any options component and the underlying security component must be less than or equal to eight contracts to 100 shares of the underlying security. Further, the Exchange proposes to state that only a Complex Order with a conforming ratio is accepted into the Exchange. This definition will bring greater clarity to the use of the term in Options 3, Section 14. The Exchange also proposes to re-number the remainder of Options 1, Section 1 and update cross-citations in Options 3, Section 10(a)(1), Options 3, Section 20(a)(1) and Options 7, Section 1(c). The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 7(v) to lowercase “Block Order” which is not capitalized in Options 3, Section 11(a). The Exchange also proposes to amend Options 3, Section 7(w) to lowercase “Facilitation Order” which is not capitalized in Options 3, Section 11(b) and to add the term “paired” as a descriptive term to signify that a facilitation order is a two-sided order. The addition of the term “paired” will distinguish a Block Order, which is not two-sided, from a paired facilitation order. Finally, the Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 7(x) to lowercase “SOM Order” which is not capitalized in Options 3, Section 11(d) and also include the term “paired” to distinguish this two-sided auction. The addition of the term “paired” will distinguish a Block Order, which is not two-sided, from a paired SOM order. The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 9(a)(2) to note that “During a halt, existing auction orders and auction responses, as well as Crossing Orders, are rejected.” Today, the ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Preview showing 10k of 24k characters. Full document text is stored and available for version comparison. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.