<NOTICE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
<DEPDOC>[Release No. 34-103994; File No. SR-Phlx-2025-43]</DEPDOC>
<SUBJECT>Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Lower the Options Regulatory Fee (ORF)</SUBJECT>
<DATE>September 17, 2025.</DATE>
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”),
<SU>1</SU>
<FTREF/>
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,
<SU>2</SU>
<FTREF/>
notice is hereby given that on September 5, 2025, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (“Phlx” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
<FTNT>
<SU>1</SU>
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>2</SU>
17 CFR 240.19b-4.
</FTNT>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change</HD>
The Exchange proposes to decrease Phlx's Options Regulatory Fee or “ORF.”
While the changes proposed herein are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the amendments become operative on October 1, 2025.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
<E T="03">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rulefilings</E>
and at the principal office of the Exchange.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change</HD>
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
<HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD3">1. Purpose</HD>
Phlx proposes to decrease its ORF at Options 7, Section 6, D from $0.0024 to $0.0003 per contract side effective October 1, 2025.
<HD SOURCE="HD3">Background on Current ORF</HD>
Today, Phlx assesses its ORF for each Customer option transaction that is either: (1) executed by a member organization
<SU>3</SU>
<FTREF/>
on Phlx; or (2) cleared by a Phlx member organization at OCC in the Customer range, even if the transaction was executed by a non-member organization of Phlx, regardless of the exchange on which the transaction occurs.
<SU>4</SU>
<FTREF/>
If the OCC clearing member is a Phlx member organization, ORF is assessed and collected on all ultimately cleared Customer contracts (after adjustment for CMTA
<SU>5</SU>
<FTREF/>
); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not a Phlx
member organization, ORF is collected only on the cleared Customer contracts executed at Phlx, taking into account any CMTA instructions which may result in collecting the ORF from a non-member organization.
<SU>6</SU>
<FTREF/>
The current Phlx ORF is $0.0024 per contract side.
<FTNT>
<SU>3</SU>
The term “member organization” means a corporation, partnership (general or limited), limited liability partnership, limited liability company, business trust or similar organization, transacting business as a broker or a dealer in securities and which has the status of a member organization by virtue of (i) admission to membership given to it by the Membership Department pursuant to the provisions of General 3, Sections 5 and 10 or the By-Laws or (ii) the transitional rules adopted by the Exchange pursuant to Section 6-4 of the By-Laws. References herein to officer or partner, when used in the context of a member organization, shall include any person holding a similar position in any organization other than a corporation or partnership that has the status of a member organization.
<E T="03">See</E>
General 1, Section 1(17).
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>4</SU>
The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and collecting the ORF. Market participants must record the appropriate account origin code on all orders at the time of entry of the order. The Exchange represents that it has surveillances in place to verify that members mark orders with the correct account origin code.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>5</SU>
CMTA or Clearing member organization Trade Assignment is a form of “give-up” whereby the position will be assigned to a specific clearing firm at OCC.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>6</SU>
By way of example, if Broker A, an Phlx member organization, routes a Customer order to CBOE and the transaction executes on CBOE and clears in Broker A's OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected by Phlx from Broker A's clearing account at OCC via direct debit. While this transaction was executed on a market other than Phlx, it was cleared by an Phlx member organization in the member's OCC clearing account in the Customer range, therefore there is a regulatory nexus between Phlx and the transaction. If Broker A was not an Phlx member organization, then no ORF should be assessed and collected because there is no nexus; the transaction did not execute on Phlx nor was it cleared by an Phlx member organization.
</FTNT>
Today, in the case where a member organization both executes a transaction and clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from that member organization. Today, in the case where a member organization executes a transaction and a different member organization clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from the member organization who clears the transaction and not the member organization who executes the transaction. Today, in the case where a non-member executes a transaction at an away market and a member organization clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to and collected from the member organization who clears the transaction. Today, in the case where a member organization executes a transaction on Phlx and a non-member clears the transaction, the ORF will be assessed to the member organization that executed the transaction on Phlx and collected from the non-member who cleared the transaction. Today, in the case where a member organization executes a transaction at an away market and a non-member ultimately clears the transaction, the ORF will not be assessed to the member organization who executed the transaction or collected from the non-member who cleared the transaction because the Exchange does not have access to the data to make absolutely certain that ORF should apply. Further, the data does not allow the Exchange to identify the member organization executing the trade at an away market.
<HD SOURCE="HD3">ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF</HD>
Today, the Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF (“ORF Regulatory Revenue”) to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed Options Regulatory Costs.
<SU>7</SU>
<FTREF/>
In determining whether an expense is considered an Options Regulatory Cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in connection with a disciplinary matter offset Options Regulatory Cost.
<FTNT>
<SU>7</SU>
The regulatory costs for options comprise a subset of the Exchange's regulatory budget that is specifically related to options regulatory expenses and encompasses the cost to regulate all member organizations' options activity (“Options Regulatory Cost”).
</FTNT>
ORF Regulatory Revenue, when combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, is designed to recover the Options Regulatory Costs to the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of member Customer options business including performing routine surveillances, investigations, examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and enforcement activities. Options Regulatory Costs include direct regulatory expenses and certain indirect expenses in support of the regulatory function. The direct expenses include in-house and third-party service provider costs to support the day-to-day regulatory work such as surveillance, investigations and examinations. The indirect expenses are only those expenses that are in support of the regulatory functions, such areas include Office of the General Counsel, technology, finance, and internal audit. Indirect expenses will not exceed 35% of the total Options Regulatory Costs, in which case direct expenses could be 65% or more of total Options Regulatory Costs.
<SU>8</SU>
<FTREF/>
<FTNT>
<SU>8</SU>
Direct and indirect expenses are based on the Exchange's 2025 Regulatory Budget.
</FTNT>
<HD SOURCE="HD3">Proposal for October 1, 2025</HD>
At this time, the Exchange proposes to decrease Phlx's ORF from $0.0024 to $0.0003 per contract side, effective October 1, 2025, as a result of fines received by the Exchange. As noted above, fines collected by the Exchange in connection with a disciplinary matter offset Options Regulatory Cost.
Phlx notes that there can be no assurance that the Options Regulatory Costs for the remainder of 2025 will not differ materially from these expectations and prior practice, nor can the Exchange predict with certainty whether options volume will remain at the current level going forward. The Exchange notes however, that when combined with regulatory fees and fines, the ORF Regulatory Revenue that may be generated utilizing an ORF rate of $0.0024 per contract side may result in ORF Regulatory Revenue which exceeds the Exchange's estimate
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Preview showing 10k of 22k characters.
Full document text is stored and available for version comparison.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.