<NOTICE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
<DEPDOC>[Release No. 34-104124; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2025-70]</DEPDOC>
<SUBJECT>Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Ordering Window Deposit Requirement in Colocation Note 8</SUBJECT>
<DATE>September 29, 2025.</DATE>
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)
<SU>1</SU>
<FTREF/>
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”)
<SU>2</SU>
<FTREF/>
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,
<SU>3</SU>
<FTREF/>
notice is hereby given that, on September 25, 2025, NYSE Arca, Inc. (“NYSE Arca” or the “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
<FTNT>
<SU>1</SU>
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>2</SU>
15 U.S.C. 78a.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>3</SU>
17 CFR 240.19b-4.
</FTNT>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change</HD>
The Exchange proposes to amend the Ordering Window deposit requirement in Colocation Note 8 of the Connectivity
Fee Schedule. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at
<E T="03">www.nyse.com,</E>
at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change</HD>
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
<HD SOURCE="HD2">A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD3">1. Purpose</HD>
The Exchange proposes to amend the Ordering Window deposit requirement in Colocation Note 8 of the Connectivity Fee Schedule.
<HD SOURCE="HD3">Background</HD>
In November 2023, the Commission approved the Exchange's proposal to amend the Connectivity Fee Schedule to provide, in Colocation Note 8, an alternative procedure by which the Exchange can allocate power in the colocation hall at the Mahwah Data Center (“MDC”)
<SU>4</SU>
<FTREF/>
via deposit-guaranteed orders from Users made within a 90-day “Ordering Window.”
<SU>5</SU>
<FTREF/>
Under that procedure, during an Ordering Window, each User may submit a single order for its anticipated power needs, without regard to the provision of Colocation Note 7 that prohibits the Exchange from accepting orders for more than four dedicated cabinets and/or 32 kW of power. Orders submitted during the Ordering Window are currently subject to deposits equal to two months' worth of the monthly recurring costs of the amount of power ordered, and such orders are not finalized until the User's signed order form and deposit are received by the Exchange. After the Ordering Window closes, space and power are allocated by the Exchange according to a formula described in Colocation Note 8.
<FTNT>
<SU>4</SU>
Through its Fixed Income and Data Services (“FIDS”) business, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”) operates the MDC. The Exchange and its affiliates New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE National, Inc., and NYSE Texas, Inc. (the “Affiliate SROs”) are indirect subsidiaries of ICE. Each of the Exchange's Affiliate SROs has submitted substantially the same proposed rule change to propose the changes described herein.
<E T="03">See</E>
SR-NYSE-2025-36, SR-NYSEAMER-2025-59, SR-NYSENAT-2025-22, and SR-NYSETEX-2025-33.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>5</SU>
<E T="03">See</E>
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98937 (November 14, 2023), 88 FR 80793 (November 20, 2023) (SR-NYSE-2023-29, SR-NYSEAMER-2023-39, SR-NYSEARCA-2023-53, SR-NYSECHX-2023-16, SR-NYSENAT-2023-18).
</FTNT>
As the Exchange explained in its original proposal, the purpose of the Ordering Window procedure is to permit the Exchange to obtain a real indication of Users' true demands for power both now and in the future. At the time of the original proposal, ICE was in the process of developing a new colocation hall—Hall 5—at the MDC, yet lacked any way to gauge Users' true demand for space and power given Users' inability to place orders for more than four dedicated cabinets and/or 32 kW of power. In addition, ICE sought firm, guaranteed commitments from Users that they would actually purchase the additional space and power if it was offered to them, thereby justifying ICE's investment in building out additional colocation halls. The Exchange developed the Ordering Window procedure to address these issues.
To date, the Exchange has used the Ordering Window procedure once, in early 2024, before the opening of the MDC's Hall 5. While the procedure worked as intended, the Exchange did observe behavior on the part of some Users that impacted the allocation of space and power. Seven Users submitted orders for 32 kW or less, and were all allocated the full amount of their orders under “Step 2” of the allocation procedure in Colocation Note 8. An additional nine Users ordered more than 32 kW. The Exchange has learned from discussions with those nine firms that five of them placed orders for the amount of power they actually wished to receive, while the other four firms placed orders for three to six times their desired amount of power—and, in some cases, more than all the power that was actually available in all of Hall 5.
<SU>6</SU>
<FTREF/>
When power was allocated to these nine firms pursuant to “Step 3” of the allocation procedure in Colocation Note 8, the result was that the five firms that ordered their actual desired amount of power received approximately 60% of their requested amounts, while the four firms that ordered several times more power than they actually wanted received an amount of power closer to their actual desired amount.
<FTNT>
<SU>6</SU>
One User submitted an order for 2,700 kW, which was more than the total amount of power available in all of Hall 5 during the Ordering Window, while another User submitted an order for 5,500 kW, nearly double that amount.
</FTNT>
<HD SOURCE="HD3">Proposed Change</HD>
ICE is currently developing an additional colocation hall at the MDC—Hall 6—and seeks to evaluate customer demand for the space and power in that Hall, as well as whether customer demand would support additional expansion projects beyond Hall 6. The Exchange plans to use the Ordering Window procedure to assist in evaluating these issues, but proposes one change to the procedure before doing so.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to increase the deposit that Users must provide when submitting orders for more than 32 kW during the Ordering Window to six months' worth of the monthly recurring costs of the amount of power ordered, up from two months' worth. There would be no change to the deposit requirement for Users ordering 32 kW or less, who would continue to provide a deposit equal to two months' worth of the monthly recurring costs of the amount of power ordered. Similarly, there would be no change to the use of the deposit: it would continue to be applied to the User's first and subsequent months' invoices after the power is delivered until it is completely depleted. If the User withdraws its order during the Ordering Window, the deposit will be returned.
The Exchange believes that increasing the deposit requirement for orders of more than 32 kW during the Ordering Window would discourage Users seeking more than 32 kW of power from acting opportunistically and placing orders for amounts of power several times their actual desired amount. The Exchange believes that increasing the deposit amount for orders exceeding 32 kW by a multiple of three will have a material effect on the ordering behavior of these Users, since ordering several times more power than their actual desired amount would tie up sizeable amounts of capital as deposits. By way of example, during the Ordering Window in early 2024, the four firms that placed orders for significantly more power than they needed paid deposits totaling $17 million; under the proposed rule change, similar orders would require deposits of $51 million. The Exchange believes from discussions with several Users that such a deposit requirement would dissuade Users from submitting such inflated orders for power.
The Exchange believes that increasing the deposit requirement to six months from two months for orders more than 32 kW is the best way to meet the goals
of the Ordering Window procedure while dissuading certain Users' opportunistic ordering behavior. In addition, the proposal would have no impact on Users ordering less than 32 kW of power, whose deposit requirement would not change and who would continue to be allocated power in “Step 2” of the allocation procedure, before any orders larger than 32 kW are considered.
<HD SOURCE="HD3">Application and Impact of the Proposed Changes</HD>
The proposed change is not targeted at, or expected to be limited in applicability to, market participants of any specific type or size. Rather, the proposed change would apply equally to any User ordering more than 32 kW of power during an Ordering Window.
Users with more modest power needs would not be disadvantaged by the proposed change. This proposal would not change the deposit requirement for Users finalizing orders during the Or
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Preview showing 10k of 19k characters.
Full document text is stored and available for version comparison.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.