<NOTICE>
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
<SUBAGY>International Trade Administration</SUBAGY>
<DEPDOC>[A-570-979]</DEPDOC>
<SUBJECT>Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2022-2023</SUBJECT>
<HD SOURCE="HED">AGENCY:</HD>
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
<SUM>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUMMARY:</HD>
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that the companies to which it granted a separate rate sold subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2023. Commerce also determines that certain companies did not ship subject merchandise during the POR. Additionally, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to one company and denying a separate rate to one company.
</SUM>
<DATES>
<HD SOURCE="HED">DATES:</HD>
Applicable December 23, 2025.
</DATES>
<FURINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:</HD>
Benjamin Blythe, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3457.
</FURINF>
<SUPLINF>
<HD SOURCE="HED">SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:</HD>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Background</HD>
On April 11, 2025, Commerce published the
<E T="03">Preliminary Results</E>
in the
<E T="04">Federal Register</E>
and invited interested parties to comment on those results.
<SU>1</SU>
<FTREF/>
On July 31, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for issuing the final results of this review by 60 days until October 8, 2025.
<SU>2</SU>
<FTREF/>
Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by 47 days.
<SU>3</SU>
<FTREF/>
Additionally, due to a backlog of documents that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an additional 21 days.
<SU>4</SU>
<FTREF/>
Accordingly, the deadline for these final results is now December 15, 2025. For details regarding the events that occurred subsequent to publication of the
<E T="03">Preliminary Results</E>
in the
<E T="04">Federal Register</E>
,
<E T="03">see</E>
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
<SU>5</SU>
<FTREF/>
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
<FTNT>
<SU>1</SU>
<E T="03">See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2022-2023,</E>
90 FR 15439 (April 11, 2025) (
<E T="03">Preliminary Results</E>
), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>2</SU>
<E T="03">See</E>
Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated July 31, 2025.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>3</SU>
<E T="03">See</E>
Memorandum, “Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,” dated November 14, 2025.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>4</SU>
<E T="03">See</E>
Memorandum, “Tolling of all Case Deadlines,” dated November 24, 2025.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>5</SU>
<E T="03">See</E>
Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China; 2022-2023,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
</FTNT>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">
Scope of the Order
<E T="51">6</E>
<E T="03">See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order,</E>
77 FR 73018 (December 7, 2012) (
<E T="03">Order</E>
).
</FTNT>
The products covered by the
<E T="03">Order</E>
are crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates, and panels, consisting of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products, including, but not limited to,
modules, laminates, panels and building integrated materials. For a complete description of the scope of the
<E T="03">Order, see</E>
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Analysis of Comments Received</HD>
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that parties submitted in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is provided in Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
<E T="03">https://access.trade.gov.</E>
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at
<E T="03">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.</E>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Final Determination of No Shipments</HD>
In the
<E T="03">Preliminary Results,</E>
Commerce determined that Jinko Solar,
<SU>7</SU>
<FTREF/>
Longi Solar Technology Co. Ltd. (Longi Solar), and Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Aiko) did not ship subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. No parties filed timely arguments disputing Commerce's no shipment determination.
<SU>8</SU>
<FTREF/>
In these final results of review, we continue to find that Jinko Solar, Longi Solar, and Zhejiang Aiko did not ship subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.
<FTNT>
<SU>7</SU>
Jinko Solar refers to the following companies which Commerce has previously treated as a single entity: Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd.; Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd.; Yuhuan Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Jinko Tiansheng Solar Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar (Yiwu) Co., Ltd.; and JinkoSolar (Shangrao) Co., Ltd.
</FTNT>
<FTNT>
<SU>8</SU>
On August 27, 2025, Jinko Solar filed untimely arguments regarding its no shipments claim which Commerce rejected.
<E T="03">See</E>
Commerce's Letter, “Rejection of Letters,” dated November 24, 2025;
<E T="03">see also</E>
Memorandum, “Rejection of Letters,” dated November 24, 2025.
</FTNT>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part</HD>
In the
<E T="03">Preliminary Results,</E>
Commerce determined that there were no entries of Red Sun Energy Long An Company Limited's (Red Sun) solar cells/modules into the United States during the POR that were suspended and subject to antidumping duties, and thus, consistent with its practice, Commerce stated that it intended to rescind this review with respect to Red Sun. No parties commented on this preliminary determination. In the absence of any suspended entries of subject merchandise from Red Sun during the POR, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to Red Sun.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Separate Rates</HD>
No parties commented on Commerce's preliminary determination to grant separate rates to certain companies
<SU>9</SU>
<FTREF/>
and to not grant a separate rate to Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. We have made no changes to Commerce's preliminary separate rates determination in these final results of review.
<FTNT>
<SU>9</SU>
The companies to which Commerce granted a separate rate are: (1) Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd. (Sungold); (2) BYD H.K. Co., Ltd.; (3) BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd.; (4) Maodi Solar Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; (5) Trina Solar Energy Development Company Limited; and (6) Trina Solar Science & Technology (Thailand) Ltd.
</FTNT>
<HD SOURCE="HD1">Dumping Margins for Separate Rate Companies</HD>
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address what dumping margin to apply to respondents that are not selected for individual examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the dumping margin for respondents that are not individually examined in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally “equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and
<E T="03">de minimis</E>
dumping margins, and any dumping margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.” Because we calculated a dumping margin that is not zero,
<E T="03">de minimis,</E>
or based entirely on facts available for Sungold, the sole participating mandatory respondent, we assigned the separate rate recipients that we did not individually examine a dumping margin equal to Sungold's dumping margin consistent with Commerce's practice and section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. For additional information,
<E T="03">see</E>
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
<HD SOURCE="HD1">China-Wide Entity<
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Preview showing 10k of 24k characters.
Full document text is stored and available for version comparison.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This text is preserved for citation and comparison. View the official version for the authoritative text.